xiaoxiang781216 commented on PR #15767: URL: https://github.com/apache/nuttx/pull/15767#issuecomment-2636579527
> > > How about use separate config to keep both? I know recent events but this is not reason we should stop developing optimization / new features. > > > One suggestion is we can keep both by config and mark new feature as experiment until it fully test and remove old config until next major release like other projects. > > > > > > Under the original semantics, new interfaces will continue to be added, and optimizations will continue. > > So, no need to revert, right? could we close this PR? No, the patch restore to the point which keep spinlock_irqsave as before, but the optimization still keep, so it's required. -- This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the URL above to go to the specific comment. To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscr...@nuttx.apache.org For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at: us...@infra.apache.org
