shaoyu-li commented on code in PR #13058:
URL: https://github.com/apache/gravitino/pull/13058#discussion_r3985429206


##########
catalogs/catalog-lakehouse-generic/src/main/java/org/apache/gravitino/catalog/lakehouse/generic/GenericCatalogOperations.java:
##########
@@ -273,57 +299,80 @@ public Table alterTable(NameIdentifier ident, 
TableChange... changes)
 
   @Override
   public boolean purgeTable(NameIdentifier ident) {
-    boolean purged = tableOps(ident).purgeTable(ident);
-    tableFormatCache.invalidate(ident);
-    return purged;
+    return dropOrPurgeTable(ident, true /* purge */);
   }
 
   @Override
   public boolean dropTable(NameIdentifier ident) throws 
UnsupportedOperationException {
-    boolean dropped = tableOps(ident).dropTable(ident);
-    tableFormatCache.invalidate(ident);
-    return dropped;
+    return dropOrPurgeTable(ident, false /* purge */);
   }
 
-  private String calculateTableLocation(
-      Schema schema, NameIdentifier tableIdent, Map<String, String> 
tableProperties) {
-    String tableLocation =
-        (String)
-            propertiesMetadata
-                .tablePropertiesMetadata()
-                .getOrDefault(tableProperties, Table.PROPERTY_LOCATION);
-    if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(tableLocation)) {
-      return ensureTrailingSlash(tableLocation);
+  /**
+   * Drops or purges a table, and hands its location back to the {@link 
TableLocationProvider}
+   * afterwards.
+   *
+   * <p>The table properties are read before the removal, because they carry 
the location the
+   * provider has to hand back, and the unprovisioning itself happens after 
the removal so that a
+   * provider never reclaims the storage of a table that is still there. A 
provider failing to
+   * unprovision is logged at WARN rather than propagated: the table is 
already gone at that point,
+   * so failing the request would report a drop that did in fact happen as 
unsuccessful and invite a
+   * retry that cannot undo anything.
+   *
+   * @param ident the identifier of the table to drop
+   * @param purge whether to purge the table instead of dropping it
+   * @return true if the table was dropped, false if it did not exist
+   */
+  private boolean dropOrPurgeTable(NameIdentifier ident, boolean purge) {
+    Map<String, String> tableProperties;
+    try {
+      tableProperties = store.get(ident, TABLE, 
TableEntity.class).properties();
+    } catch (NoSuchEntityException e) {
+      return false;
+    } catch (IOException e) {
+      throw new RuntimeException(
+          String.format("Failed to load table %s before dropping it", ident), 
e);
     }
 
-    String schemaLocation =
-        schema.properties() == null ? null : 
schema.properties().get(Schema.PROPERTY_LOCATION);
-
-    // If we do not set location in table properties, and schema location is 
set, use schema
-    // location as the base path.
-    if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(schemaLocation)) {
-      return ensureTrailingSlash(schemaLocation) + tableIdent.name() + SLASH;
-    }
+    // Built entirely before the drop, so that a store read failing here fails 
the request while
+    // the table is still there, rather than after it is gone where it could 
only be reported as a
+    // provider failure it is not.
+    TableLocationContext context =
+        TableLocationContext.builder()
+            .withTableIdentifier(ident)
+            .withTableProperties(tableProperties)
+            
.withSchema(loadSchema(NameIdentifier.of(ident.namespace().levels())))

Review Comment:
   Agreed on the reads — passing the properties already read into `tableOps()` 
removes one of them, with
   a test pinning that a drop reads the entity once.
   
   On `requiresUnprovision()`: I'd rather not add it, and if we do it should 
default to `true`.
   Defaulting to `false` means a provider that implements unprovision but 
forgets the flag silently
   never gets called — the same "the default answered for me by accident" 
failure we just agreed to
   avoid on unprovision, with a quieter symptom. Hoisting the schema out of the 
cascade and resolving it
   lazily in the context gets most of the saving without adding SPI surface.



-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
[email protected]

Reply via email to