On 05/01/15 19:32, Georg Seifert wrote:

I guess the best we can do as developers is to vote with our feet by not adopting it in 
our apps. (I haven't had to deal with an OS X source list in a while; I assume 
"vibrancy" has to be opted into? Or at least there's a way to opt out?)

No, it is on by default and no way (that I know of, and I would be very happy 
to be proven wrong) to opt out.

If you are referring to opting out of translucency in the tree/outline view, you can get rid of the effect by setting its background color to nil or something else.

I find translucency (which I think is what people really talk about in this thread when mentioning vibrancy) can greatly benefit a UI when applied sensibly but the fact that there is no way to tell tree/outline views to use VIEW background instead of WINDOW background, is, frankly, an outrage. If you want translucent VIEW background on an outline view, you actually need to put the outline in inside a NSVisualEffectsView container. Even though the tree/outline does this automatically, you just don't have any control over it.

Regards
Markus
--
__________________________________________
Markus Spoettl
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to