On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:38 AM, Graham Cox <graham....@bigpond.com> wrote:
> It's not just pointless eye-candy, it's actually contrary to usability. In > Safari, I'd come to the conclusion that the window frame "tint" was an > indication of whether you were in a private session or a non-private one, but > after some time realised that the "tint" was merely an effect of what colour > the content of the web page happened to be that had been scrolled up behind > the title bar. A small thing, but nevertheless misleading. > > It's also completely arbitrary; what meaning does having a blurry translucent > background in a souce list (but not for other window content) actually > convey? The whole idea should be canned before it becomes more pervasive. > It's already a nuisance and causes numerous graphics glitches (e.g weird > black outlines around a non-active progress bar when on a vibrant > background). Developers have better things to worry about. The problem is that when these issues were reported (*) just after the first Yosemite seed, the Radar tickets were quickly closed as "Behaves as expected". * including the suggestion to not enabled Vibrancy for apps built with previous OS X SDKs. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
