The 41 looks nice but I know a 37/40 which is a faster design, for sale in 
Florida.  It's in great shape and a real bargain right now.  The boat has a 
huge aft cabin with a queen sized berth.  You could cruise her to the Bahamas 
from where she is and the sky's the limit after that;  cruise her home or truck 
her home or explore the Carribean for five years, etc.

Chuck S

>     On 09/19/2021 8:41 PM Dave via CnC-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>      
>      
> 
>     Good evening all.
> 
>      
> 
>     Am looking to stretch out a bit, and much as I’ve enjoyed and invested in 
> my ’85 33-2 Windstar, I’m exploring larger options.  Goal is shorthanded or 
> singlehanded daysailing and local cruising on the great lakes and possibly 
> Bahamas/Caribbean.  I’ll likely upgrade to a more substantial passagemaker 
> when I retire in 5 years or so.    
> 
>      
> 
>     A centreboard C&C 41 has piqued my interest of late, and if anyone can 
> shed some light on the evolution of the model and offer some informed 
> commentary or critique, I would greatly appreciate it.
> 
>      
> 
>     I cannot find any reference to how many 41s were made, and I have not 
> seen any for sale that were made prior to ’84, though apparently it was first 
> produced in ’81.      
> 
>      
> 
>     They were available with a variety of keels, mostly 7’ or more.
> 
>      
> 
>     Photos of the earliest 41’s especially are very familiar to me, clearly 
> they are big sisters to  the 33-2 and 35-3, sharing many features, hardware 
> and materials.  
> 
>      
> 
>     I am aware too that the 41 also shares a few of the 33-2/35-3 “gotchas” – 
> leaking windows and keel sump/mast step failures.   Is the keel sump/mast 
> step problem limited to fin-keeled boats, or is this also a problem with 
> centreboard boats?
> 
>      
> 
>     Some seem to have had the handy but butt-cracking bridge deck traveller 
> (like the 33-2) filled with teak and relocated.  Brochures show the traveller 
> at the wheel and also on the cabin top.  Was traveller location an option, or 
> have many owners relocated this in the interest of comfort?  Thoughts? 
> 
>      
> 
>     Some have forward-facing nav stations, with the typical smaller boat open 
> quarter berth, some (seemingly  later models) with the bigger-boat  
> rear-facing  nav station and an “aft cabin”  (more like an enclosed quarter 
> berth)
> 
>      
> 
>     Some have with an opening tailgate through the transom, some not.
> 
>      
> 
>     The galley cabinetry appears to have varied also.
> 
>      
> 
>     And finally – a google search will turn up a fair bit of criticism of the 
> model, this surprised me.  Much of it is the usual opinion-fuelled opinion 
> (repeated ad nauseam), and some the usual sweeping generalizations regarding 
> IOR boats.  (I don’t plan to fly a spinnaker downwind in huge seas....)  
> Wikipedia curiously states:    “Designed by Robert Ball at the request of 
> C&C’s new owner Robert plaxton, who wanted [an IOR design]”
> 
>     Many commentators also suggest that the 41 is particularly racing-biased, 
> and therefore makes a less than ideal choice for single or shorthanded 
> sailing.   The brochure suggests the 41 was a production development of a 
> custom racing model. 
> 
>      
> 
>     I will likely visit the boat this week, and can certainly form my own 
> opinion much of this, but would very much welcome any thoughts.   Many thanks 
> in advance!
> 
>      
> 
>     Dave  -  33-2 (for now).
> 
>      
> 
>         
> 
>      
> 
>     Sent from Mail https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986 for Windows
> 
>      
> 
Thanks to all of the subscribers that contributed to the list to help with the 
costs involved.  If you want to show your support to the list - use PayPal to 
send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray  Thanks - Stu

Reply via email to