Regarding the Keel issue. If she took a hard grounding, likely rocks you are looking at radiating damage from the point of impact. My experience was on a J29, hitting a rock solid on the front of the keel. Stopped us dead from 5 it?s to 0. Keel stub bedding did not let go, but we did have deformation in the lead keel from the bolts plus the impact in the lead. Action there was a replacement of the keel.
Friends boat, C&C 36, didn?t have the same good luck. Rocks again, but keel was pushed up, cracking the stringers, and the hull, some water seepage due to impact, but the boat was not structurally sound. Hauled and she was repaired but not after extensive work was done to repair the structural integrity.
My advice, what does your ?gut? tell you?
If it were a car, and you can see there was undisclosed damage but you couldn?t tell what extent but it looked relatively substantial, what would you do.
Me, i would walk away.....
You are likely looking at a bill of $10K or more. This is not just a marine survey, a lot of exploratory work would need to be done to ensure the structural integrity, again. there will be other boats......
Bob
C&C 121
(On my 3rd C&C)
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 5:06 PM <cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com> wrote:
Send CnC-List mailing list submissions to
cnc-list@cnc-list.com
To subscribe or unsubscribe via email, send a message with subject or
body 'help' to
cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com
You can reach the person managing the list at
cnc-list-ow...@cnc-list.com
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of CnC-List digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Potential "Next" Boat - Keel Issue ?'s (Marek Dziedzic)
2. Re: Potential "Next" Boat - Keel Issue ?'s (Bill Coleman)
---------------------------------------------------------------- ------
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 21:03:42 +0000
From: Marek Dziedzic <dziedzi...@hotmail.com>
Subject: Stus-List Re: Potential "Next" Boat - Keel Issue ?'s
To: Stus-List <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Message-ID: <DM6PR02MB6541E1CA3E0CFCB560073220CE350@DM6PR02MB6541.nam
prd02.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_DM6PR02MB6541E1
CA3E0CFCB560073220CE350DM6PR02MB6541namp_"
--_000_DM6PR02MB6541E1CA3E0CFCB560073220CE350DM6PR02MB6541namp_
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Anything can be repaired, but I wouldn't undertake that job - I would walk=
away. It is quite possible that the structural stringers in the bottom of =
the hull have been broken.
On the other hand, if you can verify that structurally everything is sound,=
it might just need some patching and fairing. Unfortunately, the bottom wa=
s painted - possibly to hide the damage.
Marek
Ottawa On
-------- Original message --------
From: nausetbe...@optonline.net
Date: 2020-09-28 16:47 (GMT-05:00)
To: 'Stus-List' <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Subject: Stus-List Potential "Next" Boat - Keel Issue ?'s
I looked at a boat yesterday that seemed like a good contender for a =93nex=
t=94 boat, right up until just prior to leaving I looked more closely at th=
e keel and found something that does not look particularly good. I am hopi=
ng for some sage advice from the list, as in a) walk away, or b) might be r=
epaired, and if so what would be entailed and is it worth it. This would h=
ave to be on the current owner=92s tab, or a very hefty discount in the pri=
ce.
I tried to attach low res pics but that exceeded the list max message size,=
so here is a link I hope works:
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipNHJ22k8kS3ukfBzXz67enViRMDw3GAOASwiS4=
9uupKViTIDFeNzLj1LE_pav81Yw?key=3DQkR1X0FXWlgyclBzY1JYcUtIckRJRGh3dzIyMURR
The keel has a fairly significant crack extending at least 18=94 aft from t=
he leading edge. [The bottom was recently painted and I did not try to fol=
low it further aft.] That gap [in the attached photos] is at least 3/8=94 =
on the horizontal axis and about =BC=94 on the vertical. The trailing edge=
has some cracks which are not overly visible, again due to the bottom pain=
t. Unfortunately I did not look closely at / around the keel bolts, nor do=
I have any internal photos, as I noticed this after the boat was closed up=
. The boat is 4 =BD hours away so getting more photos is not feasible.
To my untrained eye it appears there was a hard grounding and the keel almo=
st seems to have shifted aft in addition to down, based on the angle of the=
line from the fairing of the hull down to the leading edge of the keel. B=
ut there does not appear to be any movement aft at the trailing edge, thoug=
h possibly it was punched up. This does not appear to be along the sump / =
keel joint as the crack is angled upwards and is not horizontal. The owner=
claims there have been no hard groundings when asked directly, only a hand=
ful of soft groundings, predominantly in sand, but I have read even that ca=
n do damage. The boat was recently under contract and surveyed and that bu=
yer decided against going forward. The reasons given by the broker did not=
include any mention of damage revealed during the survey. I do not have a=
copy of that buyers survey.
Any thoughts on what would need to be done to remedy this, or am I better o=
ff to move on and keep looking? Should the keel be dropped and the keel bo=
lts examined? Or would there be other, less intrusive / expensive fixes wh=
ich would be sufficient and safe? I realize it is difficult to really dete=
rmine the best repair without physically examining the boat but any advice =
on what likely would be required is appreciated.
Thanks,
Brian
--_000_DM6PR02MB6541E1CA3E0CFCB560073220CE350DM6PR02MB6541namp_
Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3D"Content-Type" content=3D"text/html; charset=3DWindows-1=
252">
<meta content=3D"text/html; charset=3DWindows-1252">
<meta name=3D"Generator" content=3D"Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math"}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri}
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
span.EmailStyle17
{font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext}
.MsoChpDefault
{font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif}
@page WordSection1
{margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in}
div.WordSection1
{}
-->
</style>
</head>
<body lang=3D"EN-US" link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72">
Anything can be repaired, but I wouldn't undertake that job - I would=
walk away. It is quite possible that the structural stringers in the botto=
m of the hull have been broken.
<div dir=3D"auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir=3D"auto">On the other hand, if you can verify that structurally ev=
erything is sound, it might just need some patching and fairing. Unfortunat=
ely, the bottom was painted - possibly to hide the damage. </div=
>
<div dir=3D"auto"><br>
</div>
<div dir=3D"auto">Marek </div>
<div dir=3D"auto">Ottawa On </div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>-------- Original message --------</div>
<div>From: nausetbe...@optonline.net </div>
<div>Date: 2020-09-28 16:47 (GMT-05:00) </div>
<div>To: 'Stus-List' <cnc-list@cnc-list.com> </div>
<div>Subject: Stus-List Potential "Next" Boat - Keel Issue ?'s </=
div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>
<div class=3D"WordSection1">
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">I looked at a boat yesterday that seemed like a good=
contender for a =93next=94 boat, right up until just prior to leaving I lo=
oked more closely at the keel and found something that does not look partic=
ularly good. I am hoping for some sage
advice from the list, as in a) walk away, or b) might be repaired, and if =
so what would be entailed and is it worth it. This would have to be o=
n the current owner=92s tab, or a very hefty discount in the price.
</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">I tried to attach low res pics but that exceeded the=
list max message size, so here is a link I hope works:
</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"><a href="">share/AF1QipNHJ=
22k8kS3ukfBzXz67enViRMDw3GAOASwiS49uupKViTIDFeNzLj1LE_pav81Yw?key=3DQkR1X0F=
XWlgyclBzY1JYcUtIckRJRGh3dzIyMURR"><span style=3D"color:blue">https://photo=
s.google.com/share/AF1QipNHJ22k8kS3ukfBzXz67enViRMDw3GAOASwiS49uupKViTIDFeN=
zLj1LE_pav81Yw?key=3DQkR1X0FXWlgyclBzY1JYcUtIckRJRGh3dzIyMURR</span></a></p=
>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">The keel has a fairly significant crack extending at=
least 18=94 aft from the leading edge. [The bottom was recently pain=
ted and I did not try to follow it further aft.] That gap [in the att=
ached photos] is at least 3/8=94 on the horizontal
axis and about =BC=94 on the vertical. The trailing edge has some cr=
acks which are not overly visible, again due to the bottom paint. Unf=
ortunately I did not look closely at / around the keel bolts, nor do I have=
any internal photos, as I noticed this after
the boat was closed up. The boat is 4 =BD hours away so getting more=
photos is not feasible. </p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">To my untrained eye it appears there was a hard grou=
nding and the keel almost seems to have shifted aft in addition to down, ba=
sed on the angle of the line from the fairing of the hull down to the leadi=
ng edge of the keel. But there does
not appear to be any movement aft at the trailing edge, though possibly it=
was punched up. This does not appear to be along the sump / keel joi=
nt as the crack is angled upwards and is not horizontal. The owner cl=
aims there have been no hard groundings when
asked directly, only a handful of soft groundings, predominantly in sand, =
but I have read even that can do damage. The boat was recently under =
contract and surveyed and that buyer decided against going forward. T=
he reasons given by the broker did not include
any mention of damage revealed during the survey. I do not have a co=
py of that buyers survey.
</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Any thoughts on what would need to be done to remedy=
this, or am I better off to move on and keep looking? Should the kee=
l be dropped and the keel bolts examined? Or would there be other, le=
ss intrusive / expensive fixes which would be
sufficient and safe? I realize it is difficult to really determine t=
he best repair without physically examining the boat but any advice on what=
likely would be required is appreciated.
</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Thanks, </p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal">Brian</p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"> </p>
<p class=3D"MsoNormal"> </p>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
--_000_DM6PR02MB6541E1CA3E0CFCB560073220CE350DM6PR02MB6541namp_--
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 17:06:01 -0400
From: "Bill Coleman" <colt...@gmail.com>
Subject: Stus-List Re: Potential "Next" Boat - Keel Issue ?'s
To: "'Stus-List'" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
Message-ID: <227001d695db$2c36e5a0$84a4b0e0$@com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_2271_01D695B9.A52545A0"
This is a multipart message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_2271_01D695B9.A52545A0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Judging by the aft section, it doesn=92t seem to have shifted aft. Looks =
more
like the front keel bolts needed tightening for quite awhile, and =
weren=92t .
=20
=20
Bill Coleman
Entrada, Erie, PA
=20
=20
=20
From: nausetbe...@optonline.net [mailto:nausetbe...@optonline.net]=20
Sent: Monday, September 28, 2020 4:48 PM
To: 'Stus-List'
Subject: Stus-List Potential "Next" Boat - Keel Issue ?'s
=20
I looked at a boat yesterday that seemed like a good contender for a =
=93next=94
boat, right up until just prior to leaving I looked more closely at the =
keel
and found something that does not look particularly good. I am hoping =
for
some sage advice from the list, as in a) walk away, or b) might be =
repaired,
and if so what would be entailed and is it worth it. This would have to =
be
on the current owner=92s tab, or a very hefty discount in the price. =20
=20
I tried to attach low res pics but that exceeded the list max message =
size,
so here is a link I hope works: =20
=20
<https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipNHJ22k8kS3ukfBzXz67enViRMDw3GAOASw=
iS4
9uupKViTIDFeNzLj1LE_pav81Yw?key=3DQkR1X0FXWlgyclBzY1JYcUtIckRJRGh3dzIyMUR=
R>
https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipNHJ22k8kS3ukfBzXz67enViRMDw3GAOASwi=
S49
uupKViTIDFeNzLj1LE_pav81Yw?key=3DQkR1X0FXWlgyclBzY1JYcUtIckRJRGh3dzIyMURR=
=20
The keel has a fairly significant crack extending at least 18=94 aft =
from the
leading edge. [The bottom was recently painted and I did not try to =
follow
it further aft.] That gap [in the attached photos] is at least 3/8=94 =
on the
horizontal axis and about =BC=94 on the vertical. The trailing edge has =
some
cracks which are not overly visible, again due to the bottom paint.
Unfortunately I did not look closely at / around the keel bolts, nor do =
I
have any internal photos, as I noticed this after the boat was closed =
up.
The boat is 4 =BD hours away so getting more photos is not feasible. =20
=20
To my untrained eye it appears there was a hard grounding and the keel
almost seems to have shifted aft in addition to down, based on the angle =
of
the line from the fairing of the hull down to the leading edge of the =
keel.
But there does not appear to be any movement aft at the trailing edge,
though possibly it was punched up. This does not appear to be along the
sump / keel joint as the crack is angled upwards and is not horizontal. =
The
owner claims there have been no hard groundings when asked directly, =
only a
handful of soft groundings, predominantly in sand, but I have read even =
that
can do damage. The boat was recently under contract and surveyed and =
that
buyer decided against going forward. The reasons given by the broker =
did
not include any mention of damage revealed during the survey. I do not =
have
a copy of that buyers survey. =20
=20
Any thoughts on what would need to be done to remedy this, or am I =
better
off to move on and keep looking? Should the keel be dropped and the =
keel
bolts examined? Or would there be other, less intrusive / expensive =
fixes
which would be sufficient and safe? I realize it is difficult to really
determine the best repair without physically examining the boat but any
advice on what likely would be required is appreciated. =20
=20
Thanks,=20
Brian
=20
=20
------=_NextPart_000_2271_01D695B9.A52545A0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<html xmlns:v=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" =
xmlns:o=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" =
xmlns:w=3D"urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" =
xmlns:m=3D"http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" =
xmlns=3D"http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<meta name=3DGenerator content=3D"Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#0563C1;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext=3D"edit" spidmax=3D"1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext=3D"edit">
<o:idmap v:ext=3D"edit" data="" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang=3DEN-US link=3D"#0563C1" vlink=3D"#954F72">
<div class=3DSection1>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'>Judging by the aft =
section, it doesn’t
seem to have shifted aft. Looks more like the front keel bolts needed =
tightening
for quite awhile, and weren’t .<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'>Bill =
Coleman<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><span style=3D'color:#1F497D'>Entrada,Erie, =
PA<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><span =
style=3D'color:#1F497D'><o:p> </o:p></span></p>
<div>
<div style=3D'border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt =
0in 0in 0in'>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><b><span =
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span>=
</b><span
style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
nausetbe...@optonline.net [mailto:nausetbe...@optonline.net]<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, September 28, 2020 4:48 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> 'Stus-List'<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Stus-List Potential "Next" Boat - Keel Issue =
?'s<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal>I looked at a boat yesterday that seemed like a =
good
contender for a “next” boat, right up until just prior to =
leaving I
looked more closely at the keel and found something that does not look
particularly good. I am hoping for some sage advice from the list, =
as in
a) walk away, or b) might be repaired, and if so what would be entailed =
and is
it worth it. This would have to be on the current owner’s =
tab, or a
very hefty discount in the price. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal>I tried to attach low res pics but that exceeded =
the list
max message size, so here is a link I hope works: <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><a
href="">share/AF1QipNHJ22k8kS3ukfBzXz67enViRMDw=
3GAOASwiS49uupKViTIDFeNzLj1LE_pav81Yw?key=3DQkR1X0FXWlgyclBzY1JYcUtIckRJR=
Gh3dzIyMURR"><span
style=3D'color:blue'>https://photos.google.com/share/AF1QipNHJ22k8kS3ukfB=
zXz67enViRMDw3GAOASwiS49uupKViTIDFeNzLj1LE_pav81Yw?key=3DQkR1X0FXWlgyclBz=
Y1JYcUtIckRJRGh3dzIyMURR</span></a><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal>The keel has a fairly significant crack extending =
at least
18” aft from the leading edge. [The bottom was recently =
painted and
I did not try to follow it further aft.] That gap [in the attached
photos] is at least 3/8” on the horizontal axis and about =
=BC” on the
vertical. The trailing edge has some cracks which are not overly =
visible,
again due to the bottom paint. Unfortunately I did not look =
closely at /
around the keel bolts, nor do I have any internal photos, as I noticed =
this
after the boat was closed up. The boat is 4 =BD hours away so =
getting more
photos is not feasible. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal>To my untrained eye it appears there was a hard =
grounding
and the keel almost seems to have shifted aft in addition to down, based =
on the
angle of the line from the fairing of the hull down to the leading edge =
of the
keel. But there does not appear to be any movement aft at the =
trailing
edge, though possibly it was punched up. This does not appear to =
be along
the sump / keel joint as the crack is angled upwards and is not
horizontal. The owner claims there have been no hard groundings =
when
asked directly, only a handful of soft groundings, predominantly in =
sand, but I
have read even that can do damage. The boat was recently under =
contract
and surveyed and that buyer decided against going forward. The =
reasons
given by the broker did not include any mention of damage revealed =
during the
survey. I do not have a copy of that buyers survey. =
<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal>Any thoughts on what would need to be done to =
remedy this,
or am I better off to move on and keep looking? Should the keel be
dropped and the keel bolts examined? Or would there be other, less
intrusive / expensive fixes which would be sufficient and safe? I =
realize
it is difficult to really determine the best repair without physically
examining the boat but any advice on what likely would be required is
appreciated. <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal>Thanks, <o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal>Brian<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class=3DMsoNormal><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
------=_NextPart_000_2271_01D695B9.A52545A0--
------------------------------
Subject: Digest Footer
_______________________________________________
CnC-List mailing list -- cnc-list@cnc-list.com
To unsubscribe send an email to cnc-list-le...@cnc-list.com
------------------------------
End of CnC-List Digest, Vol 180, Issue 7
****************************************
Regards,
Bob Tallman
C: 631.387.6748
Bob Tallman
C: 631.387.6748
_______________________________________________ Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray