Shawn, the Niagara 35 is a very solid, well built in my opinion and seaworthy 
boat. Pretty roomy for a 35 of that era but you are right, the layout is not 
for everybody.

I don't know your program, BUT the Niagara is painful and does terrible angles 
upwind. It's just a different sailplan compared to a C&C.

Good luck.

Bruno.

Envoyé de mon iPad

Le 12 avr. 2019 à 10:35, Shawn Wright via CnC-List 
<cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> a écrit :

Thanks all for the good info. According to the specs, the boat has a 1" shaft 
with a 3 blade bronze prop. There is a spare 2 blade elliptic with shaft. What 
I am not sure about is whether this photo is with the 3 blade or 2 blade prop. 
I suspect the 2 blade prop and shaft are from the previous A4 engine.

I will definitely want a surveyor to inspect this closely, and will of course 
do a sea trial at all engine speeds if/when the time comes.

Today, I'm off to look at a Niagara 35, with a melon sized dent in the keel. 
Mostly for curiosity, as the unusual early interior in this 1980 model is not 
well suited for a couple, given the lack of a proper double, except in the 
salon. I quite like the later Encore layout in this boat though, but they 
usually sell for more than we can afford.

On Fri, Apr 12, 2019 at 5:54 AM Russ & Melody via CnC-List 
<cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> wrote:

Hi Shawn,

I had about 4" over hang between the cutlass bearing and the prop hub on the 
35-1. It was necessary to move the prop aft and get hull clearance when 
repowering and going to a larger prop. No sense in putting in a large engine if 
you can't put that horsepower into the water effectively.

I was able to do it because I went from a 7/8" shaft to a 1 1/8" diameter.

        Cheers, Russ
        ex- Sweet, 35 mk1




At 09:03 PM 4/11/2019, you wrote:
I just noticed what appears to be a fairly long extension of the prop shaft 
beyond the support on the 35-2 pictured here:

http://www.cruisersforum.com/forums/attachment.php?attachmentid=168876&d=1524980874

It looks like there is at least 12" of shaft beyond the support before the 
prop, and bit less between the hull and the support. I recall reading a survey 
on a boat I was considering where the surveyor commented on excessive prop 
shaft extension as a possible cause of vibration. As this boat has a VW diesel 
(not sure of the transmission), I am wondered if the shaft might be too long.

How does this compare with other 35s?

--
Shawn Wright
shawngwri...@gmail.com<mailto:shawngwri...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray



--
Shawn Wright
shawngwri...@gmail.com<mailto:shawngwri...@gmail.com>
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to