Very interesting Rick Brass. Just the way I see it and the way i saw it
last Americas Cup. I have enjoyed all AC racing since the early ‘80’s
before the Australian wing keel came out and i also enjoyed the last AC and
was very impressed with high speed action and close encounters of these
foiling boats going upwards of 40 kts. I am looking forward to the 2021 cup
and sure do hope some tv network that i can get here in NS covers the event
well.

On Wed, Jan 30, 2019 at 9:52 AM Joe Della Barba via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Interesting perspective.
>
> This is *just me*, I well be a minority opinion, but the AC was not about
> cutting edge sailing to me. The 12s and Js may well have been the newest
> fastest things back in the 1920s, but by the time I was alive and watching
> it was more like seeing the best drivers in the world racing MGs or
> something. It was sailboat racing as it had been done for decades. Say kind
> of like the Triple Crown, we all know cars are faster than horses but we
> still like to see them race.
>
> So the foiling cats are fast and cool and demanding, but to me once New
> Zealand pulled their BS way back when and we countered with the cat, the AC
> was kind of done for me............
>
>
> Joe
>
> Coquina
> On 1/29/2019 8:45 PM, Rick Brass via CnC-List wrote:
>
> Joe;
>
>
>
> I do agree that the foiling cats were radically different than the
> conventional sailboats we are accustomed to. And the crew work and training
> is more demanding than on a monohull. The J class boats have hugely higher
> sheet loadings and hardware that is light years bigger than what we have on
> your 35 or my 38, but the boat itself is just bigger and not much faster.
> Whether a J class or a catamaran, the sailing is still pretty much the same
> as on one of our boats.
>
>
>
> Did you realize that Oracle was actually the faster boat in the AC finals
> in Bermuda? Her average top speed was a smidgen over 41 knots, while the
> Kiwi boat was between 40.5 and 41. Which is, on the whole, pretty cool
> since none of the races was run in over about 12 knots of wind.
>
>
>
> So why did Oracle lose? Certainly there were slight difference in the
> foils, the soft headsails, and the leg powered hydraulics of the Kiwis gave
> a lot more consistent power for foils and trimmers than the coffee grinders
> on Oracle. But from watching the races on the Jumbo Tron at the AC
> pavilion, I’m pretty much convinced the margin was crew practice and work
> load management.
>
>
>
> The skipper  of Oracle was driving. He was calling tactics. He was
> trimming the foils. He had a really cool steering wheel designed by BMW to
> control all that, plus a suite of gauges and Heads-Up displays that would
> probably rival an F18 fighter/bomber. In one race Oracle lost because, when
> they tacked the boat, they went about 15’ outside the boundary of the race
> course and had to do a 360. (The promo stuff in the BMW display area talked
> about how the boat positon on the race course and other tactical data was
> updated like 1000 times per minute. How could you run outside the
> boundary?) In pretty much every race they fell off the foils once or twice
> while tacking and jibing. And every time they fell off the foils (and
> dropped to about 9 knots) the Kiwis picked up a couple of hundred yards
> before Oracle got back up to speed. Spithill was just flat too busy and had
> too many tasks to manage.
>
>
>
> The Kiwis almost never fell off the foils. The race commentators thought
> the bicycle powered hydraulics had something to do with it because trimming
> and changing foils was faster and perhaps had more reserve pressure in the
> accumulators. But the skipper of the Kiwi boat was calling tactics and
> trimming the foils. The helmsman was doing only that – driving. Someone
> else was trimming the main. When the helmsman ran to the cockpit on the
> other side of the boat a few seconds before each tack or jibe, the skipper
> held the wheel to keep the boat in a straight line until the helmsman was
> back in place. So I think superior crew work and coordination, and probably
> more practice during the LV Cup races, was the winning margin for the Kiwis.
>
>
>
> Pretty similar to the J Class or 12 meter boats – just about 4 or 5 times
> faster.
>
>
>
> Three of us on the list went out into the sound to watch the J Class races
> in Bermuda. And I’ll admit that it was probably my most favorite part of
> the trip. We are all familiar with the groaning of a loaded jib sheet when
> you are grinding in those last few inches. Well, on a J class the winch is
> about 4 feet tall and the sheet is an inch or more in diameter. And the
> groaning of the winch was loud enough the be heard from my boat 100 or more
> yards away. The J boats are romantic – majestic even – but one of them blew
> out a spinnaker just after rounding the windward mark we were near – and
> the spin that exploded probably cost $50 0r $60K.  “Real” sailors can only
> fantasize about sailing one. Hull speed on my boat is a bit over 7 knots –
> on a J class about 40% more. Romantic as it is, J class or 12 meter racing
> is basically a very expensive, though sexy and more closely competitive,
> version of the beer can racing we all do.
>
>
>
> Now I don’t think I would go out and buy a foiling boat. There ARE
> options: a Moth, one of the mid-20’ foiling monohulls Benneteau announced
> it planned to build, an A Cat (think 40%  scale AC catamaran, 20+ knots in
> 12 knots of wind, and a race ready used one can be had for about 20K),
> whatever the new maker calls the Gunboat G4 (though a Gunboat 55 or 60
> might be cool if I ever win big in the lottery). Those boats are just too
> athletic for a fat 68 year old cruiser, and take too much practice and crew
> work for racing in the occasional charity regatta.  As Charlie said, “To
> each his own”.
>
>
>
> The boats are all different, but the tactics, the teamwork, and the skills
> needed to be successful at sailing are pretty constant.
>
>
>
> Rick Brass
>
> Washington, NC
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com
> <cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>] *On Behalf Of *Della Barba, Joe via
> CnC-List
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 29, 2019 9:11 AM
> *To:* 'cnc-list@cnc-list.com' <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> *Cc:* Della Barba, Joe <joe.della.ba...@ssa.gov> <joe.della.ba...@ssa.gov>
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List [EXTERNAL] Re: AC75 boats
>
>
>
> Foiling cats running around at 30-50 knots are an entirely different
> universe. Racing them is a sport of some kind, but it does not resemble
> what we think of as sailboat racing whatsoever to me. Among all the other
> reasons, the traditional AC race was between boats that were very close in
> speed. Absolutely superb tactics and boat handling were required to keep
> ahead of the other boat. It was pretty rare for there to be enough speed
> difference for a good crew to lose to an average one.  6.9 knots losing to
> 7.1 knots is one thing, the 7.1 knot boat is just one mistake away from
> losing. 45 vs. 55 knots, well you can still crash but it isn’t at all the
> same.
>
> Joe
>
> Coquina
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
> every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use 
> PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each
> and every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list -
> use PayPal to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray
>
> --
Sent from Gmail Mobile
_______________________________________________

Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions.  Each and 
every one is greatly appreciated.  If you want to support the list - use PayPal 
to send contribution --   https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

Reply via email to