My reply on this would read the same as Rick's.  I still have the crank for
the roller boom but the "C" bail is long gone.

Dennis C.
Touche' 35-1 #83
Mandeville, LA

On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Rick Brass via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> Randy,
>
>
>
> I get the impression that the roller reefing boom was on a number of the
> early 70s C&C models, though whether standard or optional I don’t know.
>
>
>
> My 25 came with a roller reefing boom. It also had a soft vang. Part of
> the gear included a large yellow metal “hoop”, in the top of which was a
> narrow slot (sort of like a big “C” with a small opening) and on either
> side of the slot were 2 plastic rollers. The hoop went around the boom with
> the sail going up through the slot and the top of the soft vang attached at
> the bottom of the hoop.
>
>
>
> Never worked for crap. Which is probably why you don’t see roller reefing
> booms any more.
>
>
>
> I have gone to slab reefing and a rigid Garhauer vang on the 25. But I
> still keep the old “hoop” and the hand crank for the roller reefing on the
> boat as conversation pieces.
>
>
>
> Do you need a vang? Depends on how and where you sail and on personal
> preferences.
>
>
>
> Without a vang, the boom will rise and the leach of the main will twist
> off and spill wind when you are on any point of sail except close hauled.
> The tendency for the boom to rise can be controlled by mainsheet tension,
> but the more off the wind you are (reaching and running) the more rise you
> will get. The boom could be made of depleted uranium and would still not
> significantly stop the process.
>
>
>
> A vang, rigid or soft, controls the rise of the boom and allows you to
> tension the leach for optimum performance. A rigid vang or boom kicker will
> support the boom when the sail is lowered so you can do away with the
> constant irritations of the topping lift – getting tangled in the backstay,
> needing adjustment when you foot off, forgetting to retension when you drop
> sail and having the boom fall into the cockpit, yada yada.
>
>
>
> There was a discussion on the list a couple of weeks ago about the merits
> of various rigid vangs and the Boomkicker. You should search the list
> archives and read it. You would be surprised how many of us on the list
> have a Garhauer rigid vang.
>
>
>
> Rick Brass
>
> *Imzadi  *C&C 38 mk 2
>
> *la Belle Aurore *C&C 25 mk1
>
> Washington, NC
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] *On Behalf Of *Randy
> Stafford via CnC-List
> *Sent:* Wednesday, February 10, 2016 10:27 PM
> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Cc:* randy.staff...@comcast.net
> *Subject:* Stus-List 30-1 Vang Refit?
>
>
>
> C&C Sailors-
>
>
>
> The C&C 30 MK1 hull #7 I just bought does not have a boom vang.  Perhaps
> because its boom appears designed for furling the main by rolling it around
> the outside of the boom.  Or perhaps because vangs were not standard
> equipment on 30-1s (I don't see vangs in the brochures).  But in looking at
> comparables before buying my boat, I did see 30-1s on the market with
> bangs, boom kickers, etc.
>
>
>
> Have any 30-1 sailors on this list found it necessary or unnecessary to
> have a vang?  Or necessary to rig something else to keep the boom down?
> I'm worried about the boom pulling up on broad reaches or runs.  On the
> other hand, I think it's a fairly heavy boom, and the boom-end sheeting may
> help to keep it down.  I'd be interested in your comments.
>
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Randy Stafford
>
> S/V Grenadine
>
> C&C 30 MK1 #7
>
> Ken Caryl, CO
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Email address:
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
> To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the
> bottom of page at:
> http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com
>
>
>
_______________________________________________

Email address:
CnC-List@cnc-list.com
To change your list preferences, including unsubscribing -- go to the bottom of 
page at:
http://cnc-list.com/mailman/listinfo/cnc-list_cnc-list.com

Reply via email to