Perhaps it is a function of how flexible is flexible. If both are relatively 
solid i could see it working.  In my case both were quite flexible (Volvo 
engine and chain coupler) the two started whipsawing against one another. The 
solid coupling I replaced it with was still trouble free 35 years later. 



Don Newman
C&C 44

> On Dec 11, 2013, at 17:54, Rich Knowles <r...@sailpower.ca> wrote:
> 
> Hmmm. Interesting but I have to tell you I have had regular flexible mounts 
> and a Drive Saver flexible coupling on my boat for 15 years with no problems. 
>  Others may wish to comment. 
> 
> Rich
> 
>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 18:47, Don Newman <donrnew...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Good post Rick, but one quibble.
>> If an engine has flexible mounts then it must have a solid not flexible 
>> coupling and vice versa.
>> 
>> I made that mistake when I repose red my last boat and the coupling 
>> destroyed itself with extreme prejudice in a couple of hours of running.  
>> Everything was aligned but the two components worked against each other. 
>> 
>> I learned later that this is an inflexible rule ;-)  sorry I can't provide a 
>> reference but my painful experience bears it out. The original had a solid 
>> mount and flexible coupling and the new engine had flexible mounts so I used 
>> the very substantial coupling.  
>> 
>> 
>> Don Newman
>> C&C 44
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 14:45, Rich Knowles <r...@sailpower.ca> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Josh:
>>> 
>>> I just had a look at mounts on the PYI site: 
>>> http://www.pyiinc.com/index.php?section=rd_marine&action=engine-mounts&sn=1
>>> 
>>> Their widget allows you to insert the dimensions of your existing mounts so 
>>> you can receive new mounts that should simply replace the  existing units 
>>> with no drilling or other fiddling. I trust you completed that exercise and 
>>> have received the correct units. Note, they are not stainless but zinc 
>>> plated.
>>> 
>>> Many of our boats came with some sort of metal members in the engine 
>>> mounting system and I suggest leaving well enough alone unless you have 
>>> good reason to make changes. If you do one mount at a time, you should be 
>>> able to simply undo the bolts, back off the positioning nuts, remove and 
>>> replace the old mount and, after all have been replaced, adjust the mounts 
>>> to position the engine correctly.
>>> 
>>> Well before you start, I suggest soaking the mounting bolts and nuts and 
>>> your propeller shaft flange connecting nuts and bolts with one of the 
>>> proven rust busters previously discussed on this forum.
>>> 
>>> Also, before you undo the existing mounts or make any changes to the 
>>> adjustment nut positions, I suggest you measure and record the distance 
>>> between the underside of each engine mounting bracket to the top of the bed 
>>> under it and use that measurement to set the top of the bottom nut of each 
>>> of the new mounts. Even if an old mount has settled, it will give you a 
>>> reasonable starting point to start aligning the engine.
>>> 
>>> Aligning the engine after installing the new mounts will be another chore. 
>>> This involves undoing the bolts connecting the propeller shaft flange to 
>>> the engine shaft flange and fiddling with the nuts on the mounts until the 
>>> shaft is centred in the shaft tunnel, the flanges are concentric and the 
>>> engine is aligned so the clearance between the flanges is equal or within 
>>> .001 - .002" all around. This can be a tricky job and will test your 
>>> patience, but needs to be done as best as possible. After this is done, the 
>>> system should be reasonably vibration free. Ideally the final alignment 
>>> should be done after the engine has settled on the new mounts for a few 
>>> days and the boat is in the water.
>>> 
>>> To reduce alignment and vibration problems further, I highly recommend 
>>> installing a flexible shaft coupling which will absorb most of the 
>>> remaining shaft coupling misalignment which is inevitable, especially when 
>>> the system transitions from a static state to an operating, loaded 
>>> condition.
>>> 
>>> See: http://www.pyiinc.com/index.php?section=rd_marine&action=shaft-coupling
>>> 
>>> Google will reveal many discussions of shaft alignment on the web. One of 
>>> the simplest illustrations is: http://www.ebasicpower.com/faq/alignib.htm
>>> 
>>> I also suggest checking your cutless bearing while you are fiddling with 
>>> the drive train. Note the spelling, it's not a sword:)
>>> 
>>> Good luck.
>>> 
>>> Rich Knowles
>>> INDIGO LF38
>>> Halifax, NS.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Dec 11, 2013, at 7:33 AM, Josh Muckley <muckl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hey Folks,
>>> 
>>> I'm in the process of replacing my engine mounts on Sea Hawk, equipped with 
>>> the original Yanmar 3HM35F.   I purchased mounts from PYI.  They look to be 
>>> quite high quality mounts and appear to be made of SS.  Unlike OEMs, they 
>>> are positively captured so your engine won't go flying lose if the rubber  
>>> separates.
>>> 
>>> The previous mounts were not OEM either.  In fact it appears that the PO 
>>> may have over loaded them or installed used mounts because the forward pair 
>>> appeared very compressed, almost a 1/2 in shorter and kind of inverted on 
>>> themselves.  At first glance I thought they were different designs from the 
>>> aft pair.  Because they were short it looks like the PO had to build up the 
>>> forward foundations with some 5/8 or 1/2 inch starboard (polyethylene) 
>>> blocks.
>>> 
>>> Sitting between the engine mounts and the glassed in foundation of the boat 
>>> there are 1/2 inch thick aluminum plates.  They run the full length and 
>>> width of each port and starboard foundation rail.  Because of the clearly 
>>> redesigned nature of the situation I began to question if these aluminum 
>>> plates should be there or if they too were part of the PO's engineering.
>>> 
>>> I'm looking for thoughts and advice regarding the engine mount replacement 
>>> task as well as the appropriateness of the aluminum plates.  It would also 
>>> be helpful if anyone has torques specs or design details of the fiberglass 
>>> foundation.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Josh Muckley
>>> S/V Sea Hawk
>>> 1989 C&C 37+
>>> Yanmar 3HM35F
>>> Solomons, MD
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>> _______________________________________________
>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to