Hi,

I have heard of folks using Dyneema for a preventer because they feel that 
stronger is better.   Dyneema is actually a poor choice and can actually beak 
in a sudden impulse before a simple nylon line would, but more importantly, 
using Dyneema would provide a greater beating on the rigging than necessary.  

It is the same principle as why one would not use Dyneema for anchor rodes.  
Because of the stretch, nylon feels a much smaller force.  Since the energy 
absorbed by the line is the product of force times stretch, the Dyneema, with 
little stretch, will feel a much greater force for the same sudden impulse.   
There is a great demonstration comparing Dyneema and nylon in dynamic loads at 
http://dmmclimbing.com/knowledge/how-to-break-nylon-dyneema-slings/.         


-
Paul E.
1979 C&C 29 Mk1
S/V Johanna Rose
Carrabelle, FL

On May 10, 2013, at 12:00 PM, cnc-list-requ...@cnc-list.com wrote:

> From: a.burton.sai...@gmail.com
> Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 11:32:55 -0400
> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Gybe preventer
> 
> One thing I've seen on boats that run a lot or have high, long booms, is a 
> permanently rigged piece of Dynema attached at the end of the boom and run 
> forward to the a snap-shackle at the gooseneck. That way it's easy to rig a 
> preventer to the bow when the sheets are already eased; just release the line 
> from the end of the boom and snap it to the preventer from the bow. If 
> running to the bow, I will usually just run the preventer through the mooring 
> line fairlead...with appropriate chafe protection if it's going to be rigged 
> for more than a few hours.
> 
> 
> 
> Andy
> C&C 40 
> Peregrine

_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to