As we ascend to new lows...

Rich Knowles
Indigo - C&C LF38
Halifax - Nova Scotia


On 2013-04-15, at 2:27, Russ & Melody <russ...@telus.net> wrote:

> 
> Is Kentucky Jelly a good choice to help you get it just right?  
> 
>         Oh my.
> 
> At 09:37 PM 14/04/2013, you wrote:
>> Ummm...you just stick the transducer in a jar of Vaseline? I'm not sure how 
>> this is going to work long-term. And why do you have large amounts of 
>> Vaseline?
>> 
>> 
>> On 14 April 2013 11:01, Joel Aronson <joel.aron...@gmail.com > wrote:
>> Vaseline works for an inhull transducer. 
>> 
>> Joel Aronson
>> 
>> 
>> On Apr 14, 2013, at 11:31 AM, Jim Watts <paradigmat...@gmail.com > wrote:
>> 
>>> If going in-hull, you can test your location while in the water by placing 
>>> a baggie of water between the transducer and the hull. If it works like 
>>> that, it will work glued down. This does not work if the boat is out of the 
>>> water. I shouldn't have to say that, but I will because I have had a couple 
>>> of people do just that. 
>>> 
>>> FWIW, the transducer maker, Airmar, recommends epoxy, and specifically 
>>> warns against silicone. 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 13 April 2013 08:20, dwight veinot < dwightvei...@hfx.eastlink.ca> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Yes they do…very good point, excellent memory actually.  I did not have to 
>>> be concerned because I have an old 1974 design and the under bottom is 
>>> solid and thick…I think even a bubble in that, and I know there are some 
>>> because there was one beside the hole I cut to do the through hull mount, 
>>> which may have had something to do with why it was not always reliable so 
>>> you always have to find a spot when there are no voids in the solid lay up 
>>> too, but at least if it doesn’t work you can move it fairly easily and you 
>>> don’t leave a gaping hole behind.  I got lucky first try
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Dwight Veinot
>>> 
>>> C&C 35 MKII, Alianna
>>> 
>>> Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
>>> 
>>>  
>>> From: CnC-List [ mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Russ & 
>>> Melody
>>> Sent: April 13, 2013 10:59 AM
>>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>>> Subject: Re: Stus-List New through hull transducer
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> Hi Dwight,
>>> 
>>> Don't these inside hull installations need to be in a solid layup area and 
>>> not a cored hull area? 
>>> 
>>> I seemed to remember that detail being part of past discussions on this 
>>> subject.
>>> 
>>>         Cheers, Russ 
>>>         Sweet 35 mk-1
>>> 
>>> At 12:55 AM 13/04/2013, you wrote:
>>> 
>>> Based on my experience, I would say if it’s a depth transducer install it 
>>> on the inside of your hull and either don’t cut a new hole or plug the one 
>>> you have already.  Find a nice spot on the inside, close where you want it 
>>> located, clean the area with solvent, let it dry and then apply a really 
>>> generous gob of Dow Corning silicone sealant and submerge the active face 
>>> of the transducer in it while holding on a slight angle to make sure you 
>>> don’t trap air bubbles, then press it down hard and hold there for a while. 
>>>  I did it that way based on information I got from this list because my 
>>> Raymarine depth transducer was not reliable…it has worked flawlessly to 
>>> over 200 feet (my boat draws about 6) for over 2 years and I have one less 
>>> hole in the boat…I am happy
>>>  
>>> Dwight Veinot
>>> C&C 35 MKII, Alianna
>>> Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
>>>  
>>> From: CnC-List [ mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of 
>>> jmckay533
>>> Sent: April 12, 2013 10:36 PM
>>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>>> Subject: Stus-List New through hull transducer
>>>  
>>> Good evening. I AM HOPING TO INSTALL A NEW THROUGH HULL TRANSDUCER this 
>>> weekend. What marine sealant would you suggest?
>>>  
>>> Thank you.
>>>  
>>> John on Oxygen
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Sent from Samsung tablet
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Brent Driedger <bren...@highspeedcrow.ca > 
>>> Date: 04-12-2013 6:58 PM (GMT-05:00) 
>>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
>>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Race Video 
>>> 
>>> I tend to agree Dwight. 
>>> That's a gripping video and reminds me of a very similar situation I got 
>>> myself into last year minus the crushed legs. I was being too aggressive, 
>>> boats touched and although no protest came of it, I was at fault and should 
>>> have bailed when I was getting squeezed out  of the pack before the 
>>> committee boat. 
>>> On the deck after the race much discussion was held and I insisted I could 
>>> not change course for I would have rammed the committee boat but later when 
>>> the photos came out I realized I had plenty of time to abandon the start 
>>> and not look like a knob. 
>>> The point is at speed within lengths of the line and adrenaline is up with 
>>> a bunch of fast boats a nose blow apart, it's easy to make a decision that 
>>> you wished you hadn't after the fact and unfortunately the only solution to 
>>> this is experience. 
>>> On the plus side the event was educational, provided lively beer talk and 
>>> no damage was done. 
>>>  
>>> Brent
>>> 27-5
>>> Lake Winnipeg
>>> 
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> On 2013-04-12, at 5:25 PM, dwight veinot < dwightvei...@hfx.eastlink.ca> 
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Blue was close hauled with lots of power, what looks like an uncoordinated 
>>> crew and in close quarters. She was give way boat and it looks to me like 
>>> she was barging the line hell bent to get across inside of what looks like 
>>> the committee boat, and ahead and to windward of the fleet.   If she went 
>>> up hard she either had to tack away or risk ramming what I think is the 
>>> committee boat.  I can’t tell if the leeward boat had room to fall off 
>>> safely to avoid collision with blue without making a collision with the 
>>> boat below her, looks like she was being taken up too. I heard now up now 
>>> up now up now up so someone on Blue knew they were being taken up but I 
>>> don’t think the helmsman or the crew acted soon enough or fast enough.  The 
>>> helmsman’s effort to steer up seemed ineffective, not much of a rudder on 
>>> that boat if you ask me.  The mainsail trimmer tensioned for more close 
>>> hauled course and looks like the jib trimmer did the same…seems like the 
>>> crew did not know how to sail that boat under those conditions in close 
>>> quarters…they did not appear to know what to expect from the boat and the 
>>> crew…if I turned the wheel that aggressively on my 35 I feel certain she 
>>> would go up, now I have to try that to find out for sure and ruin a 
>>> perfectly nice beat some day.  Haven’t raced in a while… what is in the 
>>> rule about barging
>>>  
>>> Dwight Veinot
>>> C&C 35 MKII, Alianna
>>> Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
>>>  
>>> From: CnC-List [ mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Alan 
>>> Bergen
>>> Sent: April 12, 2013 6:36 PM
>>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Race Video
>>>  
>>> After the preparatory signal (boats are now racing and must sail by the 
>>> racing rules) but before the starting signal, the leeward boat can sail all 
>>> the way up to head to wind.  After the starting signal, she cannot sail 
>>> higher than close hauled.  Boats must still avoid contact if at all 
>>> possible.  Crossing the starting line has no effect on how rules 11 and 14 
>>> are applied.  
>>> Alan Bergen
>>> C&C 35 Mk III Thirsty
>>> Rose City YC
>>> Portland, OR
>>>  
>>> Alan,
>>>  
>>> Does Dave Perry’s 2016 RRoS book clarify the difference, if any, between 
>>> before the start and after crossing the starting line regarding Rule 11 and 
>>> 14?
>>>  
>>> It has been a while since I read Dave’s last RRoS book but I recall 
>>> something about the right-of-way boat having more flexibility before the 
>>> starting gun. 
>>>  
>>> Martin
>>> Calypso
>>> 1970 C&C 43
>>> Seattle
>>>  
>>> From: CnC-List [ mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Alan 
>>> Bergen
>>> Sent: Friday, April 12, 2013 11:31 AM
>>> To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
>>> Subject: Re: Stus-List Race Video
>>>  
>>> Blue was allowed to sail her course until she was the give-way boat.  As 
>>> soon as she overlapped Camelot, she was the give-way boat, and had to keep 
>>> clear.  When a give-way boat is so close to a right-of-way boat, such that 
>>> the right-of-way boat cannot turn in either direction without immediately 
>>> touching the give-way boat, the give-way boat has violated her obligation 
>>> to keep clear.  They do not have to touch in order to prove that Blue did 
>>> not keep clear.  See Dave Perry's "Understanding The Racing Rules of 
>>> Sailing through 2016, page 96.  In addition, the right-of-way boat must 
>>> take the appropriate action to avoid hitting the give-way boat, when it 
>>> appears that the give-way boat is not going to keep clear, after which she 
>>> can protest the give-way boat.
>>> 
>>> There is no requirement for either boat to communicate with the other boat, 
>>> but it is prudent to do so.  If Camelot had called to Blue to head up, or 
>>> yelled "leeward boat" or "no room", it might have been enough to keep the 
>>> boats from colliding.  If Blue couldn't control her direction, she could 
>>> have called to Camelot to fall off, that she couldn't steer away, Camelot 
>>> might have been able to fall off and avoid the crash.  She then could have 
>>> protested Blue. Since both boats broke rules of part 2 of the Racing Rules 
>>> of Sailing (Blue-Rule 11, Same tack Overlapped; Camelot-Rule 14, Avoiding 
>>> Contact), both boats should have been penalized by retiring from the race 
>>> (Rule 44.1(b).
>>> Alan Bergen
>>> C&C 35 Mk III Thirsty
>>> Rose City YC
>>> Portland, OR
>>>  
>>>  
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 2012.0.2240 / Virus Database: 2641/5740 - Release Date: 04/12/13
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com 
>>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com 
>>> 
>>>  
>>> 
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 2012.0.2240 / Virus Database: 2641/5740 - Release Date: 04/12/13
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>>> 
>>> No virus found in this message.
>>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>>> Version: 2012.0.2240 / Virus Database: 2641/5742 - Release Date: 04/13/13
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -- 
>>> Jim Watts
>>> Paradigm Shift
>>> C&C 35 Mk III
>>> Victoria, BC
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -- 
>> Jim Watts
>> Paradigm Shift
>> C&C 35 Mk III
>> Victoria, BC
>> _______________________________________________
>> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to