It still depends a bit on where you are sailing. My 30-1 gets three(!) seconds 
a mile from a J-24 and in medium to light air and the flat water we sail in, 
they clobber me (to the point that we have moved them into the A fleet, the 
rest of which are under PHRF 150 boats). Get out in the Bay and it is the 
opposite. Around here, it is tough to get a 'gift' as the PHRF committee covers 
all of the Chesapeake, which is over 200 miles - and conditions may make it 
great for a boat in Annapolis and not so great in Norfolk.

Back here in the flat water, the little boats (J-24, J-80, and so forth) do 
well, out in the waves, they have to fight for their wins. (But, then you put 
John White in anything and he seems to crawl to the top)....

Or, you put Jake in his 35 and he does major damage to the non spinnaker fleet.

Oh well, Gary
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Edd Schillay 
  To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com 
  Sent: Friday, February 08, 2013 7:54 PM
  Subject: Re: Stus-List Handicap review


  Dwight,


  That might have been the intention, but that's not what it became. And, when 
you have an area where there is one or two of same-model boats, it's a guessing 
game. 


  For example, a guy in our area owns a Taylor 34. I think there is only two or 
three in the world. He has a rating of 117 and wins practically every race he 
sails in. Why? You guessed it. The owner is on the PHRF Board. 


  Corruption ran the gambit in the earlier days and the whole system is too 
objective. 


  As for performance, there are factors that are not being accounted for such 
as crew experience, sail condition and bottom prep --- and, honestly, this 
isn't golf or bowling. 


  A measurement-based system, like IRC or the late Americap, would be 
non-subjective, and would instantly erase any claims as to impropriety. Instead 
of competitors sitting at the bar saying he won because he has a gift rating, 
they can instead use trim, preparation and tactics as the reasons for victory. 


  It may not happen anytime soon, but IMHO, it would be much better for the 
sport. 




  All the best,


  Edd


  -------------------------------
  Edd M. Schillay
  Starship Enterprise
  NCC-1701-B
  C&C 37+ | City Island, NY
  -------------------------------
  914.332.4400  | Office
  914.332.1671  | Fax
  914.774.9767  | Mobile
  -------------------------------
  Sent via iPhone 5

  On Feb 8, 2013, at 6:47 PM, dwight veinot <dwightvei...@hfx.eastlink.ca> 
wrote:


  Edd, it’s a performance based system…



  Dwight Veinot

  C&C 35 MKII, Alianna

  Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Edd 
Schillay
  Sent: February 8, 2013 5:19 PM
  To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
  Subject: Re: Stus-List Handicap review



  All,



              Here's my 3 cents (increased for inflation) on PHRF. In the past, 
I've found the PHRF Board from the YRA of LIS to be the most corrupt and 
ethically-challenged group in existence. To quote a famous movie, "You will 
never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy." 



              Now, things have gotten better in our area, but the problem I see 
is that the sins of the past are hard to correct. This was especially true 
recently with an issue with the J/105 rating, which was WAY different than in 
other areas. But no board of people is ever going to say "we messed up" and 
adjust 18 points. That would just exposed how bad the system was (and is.)



              The bigger problem is that it's all we got. IRC measurements are 
expensive and can only be done for larger boats. There was promise with 
Americap, but that died out. There needs to be a way to eliminate the human 
element that we see on PHRF boards and find a formula system similar to what 
the IRC and Americap systems used, but make it free and universal. Until then, 
love it or hate it, we're stuck with PHRF. 



              So there's the challenge -- And I urge all you retired mathematic 
or engineering experts to fire up that old Apple II computer and come up with a 
system that will take in sail area, displacement, waterline and the I, J, P and 
E measurements (and give credits for certain speed-affecting cursing gear) and 
spit out a rating number or Time Correction Factor that will end all the 
favoritism and corruption at the local PHRF Board. 



              There has got to be a way. 

              

              

              All the best,



              Edd





              Edd M. Schillay

              Starship Enterprise

              C&C 37/40+ | Sail No: NCC-1701-B

              City Island, NY 

              Starship Enterprise's Captain's Log Website






------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  No virus found in this message.
  Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
  Version: 2012.0.2238 / Virus Database: 2639/5588 - Release Date: 02/07/13

  _______________________________________________
  This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
  http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
  CnC-List@cnc-list.com



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
  http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
  CnC-List@cnc-list.com
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to