Thanks for the detailed explanation Dennis!
I have setup #3, just like Ron and I consider my mast to be a tree trunk as
well. I haven't noticed any movement in the mast but maybe I just don't
have enough experience to see it. I haven't spent much time sailing on many
other boats, only a few and only briefly. My frame of reference is very
limited.

Steve
C&C 32
Toronto


On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Ronald B. Frerker <rbfrer...@yahoo.com>wrote:

> The mast extrusion is an important part.
> The C&C 30-1 has config. 3 but has a tree trunk for a mast.  No pumping,
> but then one can't achieve any mast bend either.  Backstay only tightens
> forestay; doesn't induce any bend.
> Ron
> Wild Cheri
> C&C 30-1
> STL
>
>
> --- On *Thu, 10/18/12, Dennis C. <capt...@yahoo.com>* wrote:
>
>
> From: Dennis C. <capt...@yahoo.com>
>
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Dyneema baby stay
> To: "cnc-list@cnc-list.com" <cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> Date: Thursday, October 18, 2012, 10:55 AM
>
>
> Steve,
>
> Mast pumping is when the middle of the mast moves fore and aft as the boat
> hits waves or is subjected to sudden puffs.  Pumping is minimized by
> babystays or running backs.  Running backs are lines or wires attached at
> stress points on the mast which then run aft to a purchase or winch to
> allow tensioning or relaxing.
>
> First, a primer on some generic rig types.
>
> 1. Mast with split lower shrouds.  Upper shroud attaches to point on deck
> dead abeam of mast then carries upward to spreader(s) then to top of mast.
>  Fore and aft lower shrouds attach to points on deck forward and aft of
> upper shroud attachment.
>
> 2. Mast with inline shrouds and swept back spreader(s).   All shrouds are
> attached to same point at deck somewhat aft of mast.  Spreaders are angled
> aft from mast.
>
> 3. Mast with inline shrouds and straight spreaders.  All shrouds are
> attached to same point at deck dead abeam of mast.  Spreaders are straight,
> not angled.
>
> OK.  In configuration 1, the middle of the mast is stabilized by the lower
> shrouds.  This configuration rarely pumps unless the lower shrouds are
> loose.
>
> In configuration 2, the mast is bent by tightening the shrouds.  The
> tension on the shrouds pushes forward on the spreaders resulting in the
> middle of the mast being pushed foreward.  These rigs are somewhat subject
> to pumping.  You may or may not see babystays or running backs.
>
> Configuration 3 is most subject to pumping.  With inline shrouds and
> straight spreaders, there is nothing to stabilize the middle of the mast
> fore and aft.  If the mast extrusion is bendy, it will bend back and forth,
> hence pumping.
>
> Dennis C.
> Touche' 35-1 #83
> Mandeville, LA
>
>   ------------------------------
> *From:* Stevan Plavsa <stevanpla...@gmail.com>
> *To:* cnc-list@cnc-list.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, October 18, 2012 10:19 AM
> *Subject:* Re: Stus-List Dyneema baby stay
>
> What exactly is mast pumping?
> The early 32's seemed to not come with baby stays but I believe the later
> ones did. I've also read that the 32 is "prone to mast pumping" but I don't
> know what that means :)
> I have an idea, but I don't really know. Mine is an early one with no baby
> stay. However, there is a funny little attachment point (female, threaded,
> ~1/2") on the floor inside the vee birth that I have no idea what it's for,
> maybe related, maybe not.
>
> Thanks,
> Steve
> C&C 32
> Toronto
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:34 AM, Morgenstern, Keith E CIV SEA 08 NR <
> keith.morgenst...@navy.mil<http://mc/compose?to=keith.morgenst...@navy.mil>
> > wrote:
>
> This may come across as pedantic....but have you ever tried to cut
> dyneema?
>
> That stuff is *hard* on knives.....I have a Spanish steel bladed (like
> they use for swords), and I can only make 1 splice before it's time to
> reshapen.
>
> I've switched to utility knives, and go thru at least 1 blade (usually
> both tips) every splice.
>
> So..yeah, it's "fabric" in the sense that it's not metal, but It's
> insanely resilient and tough.
>
> For babystay, I'd switch in a heart beat, if I hadn't replaced it with
> wire only a few years ago before I was hooked on spectra.
>
> And that's the new name for my next rock band: "Hooked on spectra"
>
> -Keith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pat Nevitt 
> [mailto:pnev...@gmail.com<http://mc/compose?to=pnev...@gmail.com>
> ]
> Sent: Thursday, October 18, 2012 9:11
> To: Law Office of Craig Meyerson; 
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com<http://mc/compose?to=cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
> Subject: Re: Stus-List Dyneema baby stay
>
> I have a 29-2 that has a baby stay on it.  The stay normally stays
> shackled to the mast base except in heavier air when I run the shackle
> to a ring in the center of the deck.  The stay is cable to a series of
> blocks that give me 4:1 purchase and aline that runs back to the cockpit
> through a rope clutch.  Whether you need it or not depends on how much
> wind you get.  Here on the Chesapeake I rarely use it.  During the race
> last Sunday however with winds at 16-19, gusts to 24, we put it on when
> going upwind and it really helps flatten the mainsail.  With the setup I
> have it is really easy to release the clutch to take the tension off the
> shackle and then run the shackle back to the mast for the downwind run.
> I don't know about using Dynema.  The thing that bothers me about that
> is that at the end of the day, it is still fabric and something sharp
> can cut it and destroy it.
>
> Pat Nevitt
> Patriot
> C&C 29 MKII
> Galesville MD
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 7:40 AM, Law Office of Craig Meyerson
> <craigmeyer...@yahoo.com <http://mc/compose?to=craigmeyer...@yahoo.com>>
> wrote:
>
>
>         I installed a traveler track from the mast base to the forward
> most point on the deck I wanted the baby stay to reach on my old C&C 34.
> Put an adjustable car on the track controlled from the cockpit.  Used
> dyneema for the stay.  Downwind adjusted the car aft to get out of the
> way for dip-pole jibing and aft pole adjustment.  Worked very well.
> Should be helpful for end to end jibing too.  The dyneema was on its
> fourth season when I sold the boat.
>
>         Baby stay reduces mast pumping upwind, so I would not remove it.
>
>
>          Craig Meyerson
>         C&C 115 Souvenir
>
>
>         From: dwight veinot 
> <dwightvei...@hfx.eastlink.ca<http://mc/compose?to=dwightvei...@hfx.eastlink.ca>
> >
>         To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com<http://mc/compose?to=cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
>         Sent: Wednesday, October 17, 2012 6:28 PM
>
>         Subject: Re: Stus-List Dyneema baby stay
>
>
>         Won't be much easier
>
>         Dwight Veinot
>         C&C 35 MKII, Alianna
>         Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
>
>         -----Original Message-----
>         From: CnC-List 
> [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com<http://mc/compose?to=cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com>]
> On Behalf
> Of
>         dre...@gmail.com <http://mc/compose?to=dre...@gmail.com>
>         Sent: October 17, 2012 10:10 AM
>         To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com<http://mc/compose?to=cnc-list@cnc-list.com>
>         Subject: Stus-List Dyneema baby stay
>
>         Hi,
>
>         I am looking for a solution to help make my baby stay more
> easily removable.
>         I presently have a standard 1x19 SS cable turn buckle set up,
> and I plan to
>         install a pelican-like hook attachment.  I have a colleague who
> is
>         replacing his SS lifelines with Dyneema line.  This got me to
> think about
>         using Dyneema for the baby stay.    Does anyone have any
> experience in using
>         a Dyneema solution for any rigging arrangements?
>
>
>         -
>         Paul E.
>         1979 C&C 29 Mk1
>         S/V Johanna Rose
>         Carrabelle, FL
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>
>         http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/
>
>         CnC-List@cnc-list.com <http://mc/compose?to=CnC-List@cnc-list.com>
>         -----
>         No virus found in this message.
>         Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>         Version: 2012.0.2221 / Virus Database: 2441/5336 - Release Date:
> 10/16/12
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>
>         http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/
>         CnC-List@cnc-list.com <http://mc/compose?to=CnC-List@cnc-list.com>
>
>
>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
>         http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
>         CnC-List@cnc-list.com <http://mc/compose?to=CnC-List@cnc-list.com>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com <http://mc/compose?to=CnC-List@cnc-list.com>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com <http://mc/compose?to=CnC-List@cnc-list.com>
>
>
>
> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com <http://mc/compose?to=CnC-List@cnc-list.com>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> CnC-List@cnc-list.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
CnC-List@cnc-list.com

Reply via email to