The last time I upgraded was quite a while ago - from Debian woody to
Sarge.  This upgrade was a DISASTER.  So much for promises.

(I think there is a song about that)

A process when it is shutting down much call wait() and this is when
system resouces are released.  Until wait() is called the process goes
into a zombie state.  I have firefox for instance die about once a week
since say about 2006.  Oh it works... It just spews a few 100 zombies,
rns out of memory and the kernal kills it and cleans up the mess.

Other than an annoyance this is not a big problem for me.  I simply
restart it when its convient and go do something else while it
reloads... which it ususlly but not always does and if not then I do
have checkpoint files in the sessionstore.js files which in my case live
in: .mozilla/firefox/jfthz6j9.default>

Its a library mismatch issue.  Likely nothing more than that.  So where
is the utility which can spin through the libraries and actually CONFIRM
that the proper versions are present.

This is a very simple data base operation.  All we need is a program to
walk the directory tree and confirm required files are present and this
is what apt has to do anyways.  Well I would think eight (8) years
should be sufficent.

So I am going back to the way I use to install an OS.  I buy a new
computer and if I can't justify that I at least buy a new hard drive!

I think this speaks to the comments below.

What we need are very simple tools which can actually access a common
data base of dependancies which hopefully will run off the appropriate
mirrors.  Then if a mistake is made it can be corrected and I would
suggest the next time said utility is run it should advise the client of
any other apps which might have a correction.  And I'll speak (write) to
this next.

Several years ago I was in a chat room and someone was trying to get a
CDBurner working.  This was alas in Debian Sarge and I think the app was
k3b.  I submitted the solution, perhaps to the wrong place.  A year
later someone else on IRC was asking the same question.  So I told him
where to go.  A year later:  No improvemnt.

I conclude we have what Cool Hand Luke suggested is a failure to
communicate.

-------------

Now I have a question:  I'm about to install the latest version of
Debian.  It will not be an upgrade.  I'm not making that mistake again.

The video in the machine in question is not what will be there down the
track.  At this point I don't even know what card it is - but its good
enough for an install.  Down the track I might put in two single monitor
cards - likely old decrepid ones, or I might try a 5 head card.

These all required TOTALLY different drivers.  

How hard is it to switch video systems?  If a card dies and there is no
spare how does one even get into a GUI to reconfigure a new card?  

I have NEVER liked GUI's for this simple reason.  BUT - I believe it is
feasible to write a system tool which can run in "EITHER" command prompt
-or- GUI modes.  Does anyone know if there is anything out there which
acutally does something like this?  





On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 03:55:43PM -0700, Mel Walters wrote:
> Linux. Debian (Stable)
> 
> For the intense hobbyist only?
>  Here is just a question:
> How much truth is in the statement 'Installing and maintaining modern
> Linux is a non issue for the potential user now. Lets move on.'?
> 
> My recent experience was in helping a friend fix his upgrades after his
> GUI upgrade gave an unhelpful error code he was unable to overcome.
> The issues appeared to be authentication and the GUI hiding what was
> going on in the background. Others prefer the command line and ncursers
> like programs (aptitude) so they can see what is going on. With out my
> intermittent help he would be unable use Linux a lot of the time.
> Some of it is just computer user issues, but I'll bet that's not the
> whole picture.
> 
> Thoughts?
> 
> Mel
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> clug-talk mailing list
> clug-talk@clug.ca
> http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
> Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
> **Please remove these lines when replying

_______________________________________________
clug-talk mailing list
clug-talk@clug.ca
http://clug.ca/mailman/listinfo/clug-talk_clug.ca
Mailing List Guidelines (http://clug.ca/ml_guidelines.php)
**Please remove these lines when replying

Reply via email to