Oh, sure, it would be documented in the manual. Then I think API only is fine.
--Sheng On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Ahmad Emneina <aemne...@gmail.com> wrote: > Oh no, I'm all for API only access, of ipv6 features, for 4.1. The UI can > come down the line... whoever wants to play with this feature will likely > be okay with the experimental template downloaded out of band too. Is this > going to be documented somewhere? > > > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 11:16 AM, Chip Childers > <chip.child...@sungard.com>wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:00:26AM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: >> > On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:20 AM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> >> wrote: >> > > On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 03:21:38PM +0530, Radhika Puthiyetath wrote: >> > >> Hi Sheng, Chip and other community members, >> > >> >> > >> What have we decided about the IPv6 support in 4.1 ? >> > > >> > > Looks like it isn't decided. Do you have an opinion? >> > > >> > > Do others? >> > > >> > > Sheng - can you try to bring this to a consensus? >> > >> > In fact I am trying to bring this to a consensus using this thread... >> > >> > I think we're OK with API only. >> >> Ahmad is suggesting otherwise, but I'm in agreement with you. Our next >> feature release is probably the right time to bring it into the UI. >> >> Ahmad - any reasoning you can share around why you suggest having it in >> the UI? >> >> > >> > --Sheng >> > > >> > >> >> > >> API only, or both UI and APIs ? I am in the process of documenting >> this feature. >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> Thank You >> > >> -Radhika >> > >> >> > >> -----Original Message----- >> > >> From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] >> > >> Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:43 AM >> > >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >> > >> Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1 >> > >> >> > >> UI + docs on how to use the feature via api and its caveats (system >> template X). >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers >> > >> > <chip.child...@sungard.com> >> > >> > wrote: >> > >> > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: >> > >> > >> Hi, >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for 4.1 >> > >> > >> release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6 to avoid >> > >> > >> confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1 >> > >> > >> >> > >> > >> --Sheng >> > >> > >> >> > >> > > >> > >> > > So we talked about it being experimental. Do you think we should >> > >> > > make experimental = API-based configuration only? I tend to lean >> > >> > > that way >> > >> > myself. >> > >> > >> > >> > I am OK with it, just want to hear more people's idea on it. >> > >> > >> > >> > If it's only API-based, it would be more difficult for potential >> user >> > >> > to try it. But left UI there without default system vm template >> > >> > support would be misleading. >> > >> > >> > >> > --Sheng >> > >> > >> > >> >> > >>
