On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for 4.1 >> release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6 to avoid >> confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1 >> >> --Sheng >> > > So we talked about it being experimental. Do you think we should make > experimental = API-based configuration only? I tend to lean that way myself.
I am OK with it, just want to hear more people's idea on it. If it's only API-based, it would be more difficult for potential user to try it. But left UI there without default system vm template support would be misleading. --Sheng
