Hi Sheng, Chip and other community members, What have we decided about the IPv6 support in 4.1 ?
API only, or both UI and APIs ? I am in the process of documenting this feature. Thank You -Radhika -----Original Message----- From: Ahmad Emneina [mailto:aemne...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2013 3:43 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: Reverting UI for IPv6 in 4.1 UI + docs on how to use the feature via api and its caveats (system template X). On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 2:08 PM, Sheng Yang <sh...@yasker.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Chip Childers > <chip.child...@sungard.com> > wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 06, 2013 at 01:50:20PM -0800, Sheng Yang wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Since we didn't plan to include ipv6 template as default for 4.1 > >> release, is it necessary to revert the UI part of IPv6 to avoid > >> confusion in 4.1? We can support API only for 4.1 > >> > >> --Sheng > >> > > > > So we talked about it being experimental. Do you think we should > > make experimental = API-based configuration only? I tend to lean > > that way > myself. > > I am OK with it, just want to hear more people's idea on it. > > If it's only API-based, it would be more difficult for potential user > to try it. But left UI there without default system vm template > support would be misleading. > > --Sheng >
