On Mar 2, 2013, at 7:40 AM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote: > > On 02/03/2013, at 2:44 AM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > >> >> OK - I'm going to draft this up and start a vote now. > > I don't want to derail the voting process, but would like to clarify this > part: > > --- > recommend a new chair through consensus via a lazy 2/3 majority > voting method. In the case that consensus is not achieved, the PMC > will vote for a chair using Single Transferable Vote (STV) voting. > --- > > At first, I thought the first part meant voting on a number of candidates - > but reading this thread it seems you meant: > - take nominations, discussion ensues > - if there is one name settled vote to confirm the decision to present to the > board > - if there's not a single name, then use STV > > Is that right? It may need a bit of clarification on what the first vote is > about - but I don't think that should change the vote in progress.
That was the intent, yes. I'll propose a slight clarification to the wording in the vote thread. > > Cheers, > Brett > > -- > Brett Porter > br...@apache.org > http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ > http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter > http://twitter.com/brettporter > > > > > >
