On Mon, Feb 25, 2013, at 10:58 AM, Chip Childers wrote: > And while we're at it, the private discussion brought up the idea of > re-introducing a rotation (or at least a "term"), which would allow > for a regular opportunity to recommend a change to the board. I'm not > sure that it's required, given the nature of the job... but does anyone > have an opinion?
It'd be a good idea to have a term, but not a requirement than a chair can't serve a second (or third, fourth, eighteenth...) term consecutively. Best, jzb -- Joe Brockmeier j...@zonker.net Twitter: @jzb http://www.dissociatedpress.net/
