On 02/03/2013, at 2:44 AM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote:
> > OK - I'm going to draft this up and start a vote now. I don't want to derail the voting process, but would like to clarify this part: --- recommend a new chair through consensus via a lazy 2/3 majority voting method. In the case that consensus is not achieved, the PMC will vote for a chair using Single Transferable Vote (STV) voting. --- At first, I thought the first part meant voting on a number of candidates - but reading this thread it seems you meant: - take nominations, discussion ensues - if there is one name settled vote to confirm the decision to present to the board - if there's not a single name, then use STV Is that right? It may need a bit of clarification on what the first vote is about - but I don't think that should change the vote in progress. Cheers, Brett -- Brett Porter br...@apache.org http://brettporter.wordpress.com/ http://au.linkedin.com/in/brettporter http://twitter.com/brettporter
