On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 11:52:28AM +0530, David Nalley wrote: > On Feb 27, 2013 10:16 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:21:28AM +0530, Chip Childers wrote: > > > The TL;DR version: > > > > > > The issue that we ran into with several features being developed > > > "outside the community" for 4.1 was a major deal, and it had several > > > implications. First, doing that effectively hurts our community. The > > > other issue is related to the legal right of the project to accept the > > > code developed elsewhere. > > > > > > > Ok - I read *all* of it and still have a lingering question: > > > > What happens to code/docs etc that is released by a commercial entity > > re-branding ACS with the ASF license before it is released as an > > official ACS release? Said code was developed per the community > > guidelines but just was released before the ACS code was released. Is > > that okay? > > > > -- > > Prasanna., > > That is okay. > We don't care what people do with ACS code. We care that code that comes > into ACS is developed here.
Thanks David - everything looks good otherwise. -- Prasanna.,
