On Feb 27, 2013 10:16 PM, "Prasanna Santhanam" <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:21:28AM +0530, Chip Childers wrote: > > The TL;DR version: > > > > The issue that we ran into with several features being developed > > "outside the community" for 4.1 was a major deal, and it had several > > implications. First, doing that effectively hurts our community. The > > other issue is related to the legal right of the project to accept the > > code developed elsewhere. > > > > Ok - I read *all* of it and still have a lingering question: > > What happens to code/docs etc that is released by a commercial entity > re-branding ACS with the ASF license before it is released as an > official ACS release? Said code was developed per the community > guidelines but just was released before the ACS code was released. Is > that okay? > > -- > Prasanna.,
That is okay. We don't care what people do with ACS code. We care that code that comes into ACS is developed here.
