On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 12:21:28AM +0530, Chip Childers wrote: > The TL;DR version: > > The issue that we ran into with several features being developed > "outside the community" for 4.1 was a major deal, and it had several > implications. First, doing that effectively hurts our community. The > other issue is related to the legal right of the project to accept the > code developed elsewhere. >
Ok - I read *all* of it and still have a lingering question: What happens to code/docs etc that is released by a commercial entity re-branding ACS with the ASF license before it is released as an official ACS release? Said code was developed per the community guidelines but just was released before the ACS code was released. Is that okay? -- Prasanna.,