> -----Original Message----- > From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2013 12:35 AM > To: CloudStack DeveloperList > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account > > Yes, I believe an alarm should be raised. This way it is possible to initiate > a > workflow in an external system to get higher limits approved.
We can plan this as an enhancement for future release. > > On 1/23/13 9:06 AM, "Sanjay Tripathi" <sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > >Comments Inline > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] > >> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 12:22 PM > >> To: CloudStack DeveloperList > >> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account > >> > >> Are there any alarms / events /warnings raised for this condition? > >[] If user cross the resource limit set for his/her account, > >CloudStack throws a message to the user that limit of this resource > >type has been exceeded. Apart from this CS does not send any alarm or > >warnings for this condition(if there is a requirement for this, I can > >definitely add it into this feature). > > > >> Can the end-user see how much capacity he / she has left (through an > >> API > >> call) > >> Can they see it on the UI? > >[] We don't have separate API for this. To calculate the resources that > >are left for his/her account, user can use listAccounts API which > >displays the resource limits and the total resources that are being > >consumed by that account. > >In CloudStack UI, user can see the resource details under the "accounts" > >detailView. > > > >> Should the limits be associated with an account? Or should the > >>account be linked to a 'rate plan'. > >> > >> On 1/21/13 10:36 PM, "Chiradeep Vittal" <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >> >Please update the FS with this important detail. > >> > > >> >On 1/16/13 11:52 AM, "Sanjay Tripathi" <sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com> > >>wrote: > >> > > >> >>Koushik, > >> >> > >> >>>What is the upgrade story? For e.g. say based on the existing VM's > >> >>>for an account, the total CPU and RAM exceeds the global maximums. > >> >>>What happens in this case? > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>If admin sets the limits for an account and suppose that account > >> >>already has existing VMs whose total CPU and RAM counts are > >> >>exceeding the limits, in this case CloudStack would not shut down > >> >>the VMs assigned to account to level the resources. If the user > >> >>tries to deploy a VM, CS will check the limits of that account and > >> >>in this case CS will not allow the account to deploy the VM. > >> >> > >> >>>Also for CPU number of cores are considered, should speed also be > >> >>>considered? > >> >>Thanks for suggestion :), we can consider speed also as a part of > >> >>CPU resource. > >> >> > >> >>Thanks, > >> >>Sanjay > >> >> > >> >> > >> >>> -----Original Message----- > >> >>> From: Chris Sears [mailto:chris.x.se...@sungard.com] > >> >>> Sent: Wednesday, January 16, 2013 10:39 PM > >> >>> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org > >> >>> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Limit Resources to domain/account > >> >>> > >> >>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 6:00 AM, Sanjay Tripathi > >> >>> <sanjay.tripa...@citrix.com > >> >>> > wrote: > >> >>> > >> >>> > Can anyone suggest that what should be the default max resource > >> >>> > values that an account/project can have for the following > >> >>> > global config > >> >>> parameters: > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> It seems like the least surprising default max would be to leave > >> >>>them all unlimited. Otherwise, it's likely some admins will just > >> >>>overlook this and then just stumble upon the arbitrary limit. If > >> >>>you default to unlimited, only admins who need to restrict it > >> >>>will need to be concerned with the settings. > >> >>> > >> >>> As an aside, I wasn't clear from the FS how to specify "unlimited" > >> >>>in the UI. > >> >>> Does leaving the value blank imply unlimited? > >> >>> > >> >>> - Chris > >> > > >
