FS is created for this feature at https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/aws-style-health-checks.html This is initially discussed in the ticket https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-443
Thanks Rajesh Battala -----Original Message----- From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:37 AM To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances I have added a requirements page under 4.1 for this requirement. https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Load+Balancer+Health +checks Regards, Manan Shah On 12/18/12 7:59 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> wrote: > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] >Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:21 AM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced >instances > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] >Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:38 AM >To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced >instances > >> One question that I have though, which may be off topic to the >> specific proposal. I understand that you are proposing Netscaler and >> HAProxy support (and you are absolutely within your right to only >> volunteer for those two), but I'd also love to see the F5 support be >> upgraded to support this feature as well. >> >> Does anyone remember if F5 lent engineering support when F5 support >> was added to CS? Or was it all Cloud.com / Citrix folks that did it? >> Ideally, this is a great place to see if we can get someone that's >> interested in continuing to support the F5 LBs involved in >> development (not necessarily someone sponsored by F5, but that's not >> necessarily a negative if they were). Does anyone want to take this >> on and work with Rajesh? >> > >F5 was entirely written by Cloud.com. > >On features that can affect multiple hardware resources, we should >create a subtask for each hardware resource to support that feature. > >--Alex > > >We can have an umbrella ticket and create a sub ticket/task for each >Hardware resource. I will create those tickets. > >Thanks >Rajesh Battala > > >Done creating the sub-tasks for each hardware resources. >Here are the tickets. > >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-663 health monitoring >for F5 load balanced instances >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-664 Health monitoring >for NetScaler load balanced instances >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-665 Health monitoring >for HAProxy load balanced instances >https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-666 Health monitoring >for Brocade load balanced instances > > >Thanks >Rajesh Battala
