Hi Chiradeep, I have added HAproxy section to the FS. I will update the API's/Commands for haproxy once Am done with NetScaler.
Thanks Rajesh Battala -----Original Message----- From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 12:51 PM To: CloudStack DeveloperList Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced instances The new FS does not make mention of HAProxy? On 1/16/13 8:57 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> wrote: >Hi Chiradeep, > >Here is the FS link for AWS Style health checks >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/AWS+Style+Health >+Ch >ecks >I have added NetScaler Nito API classes to the FS. >API's starting with "Configure" as used to create devices like >(configureF5LoadBalancer, configureNetscalerLoadBalancer , etc) I had >modified the API Command from configureLBHealthCheck to >createLbHealthCheck. > >Sorry I didn't get your question in the below thread. > >Thanks >Rajesh Battala > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2013 1:40 AM >To: CloudStack DeveloperList >Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced >instances > >Has this been updated? >Note that FS's are being posted under >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/ >And that one already is here: >https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Load+Balancer+He >alt >h >+checks > >On 1/7/13 11:30 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> wrote: > >>Hi Chiradeep, >> >>I would be supporting NetScaler and HAProxy. >>First I would be working on NetScaler and then haproxy. >>I don't have permission to create branch in asf, I would be cloning >>asf master in git hub and will work on it by regularly rebasing the >>repo with master. >> >>I will update NS API's in the FS. >> >>Thanks >>Rajesh Battala >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com] >>Sent: Tuesday, January 8, 2013 12:32 PM >>To: CloudStack DeveloperList >>Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced >>instances >> >>Thanks Rajesh. >>Is the feature going to be supported only with NetScaler devices? >>There's a few places where it says Virtual Router. >> >>Features should be developed on feature branches. >>Can you document the exact API? >>IIRC, there is no other CS API that begins with "configure" >> >> >>On 1/7/13 10:53 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> wrote: >> >>>FS is created for this feature at >>>https://cwiki.apache.org/CLOUDSTACK/aws-style-health-checks.html >>>This is initially discussed in the ticket >>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-443 >>> >>>Thanks >>>Rajesh Battala >>> >>>-----Original Message----- >>>From: Manan Shah [mailto:manan.s...@citrix.com] >>>Sent: Saturday, December 22, 2012 4:37 AM >>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>Subject: Re: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced >>>instances >>> >>>I have added a requirements page under 4.1 for this requirement. >>> >>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/Load+Balancer+ >>>H >>>e >>>alt >>>h >>>+checks >>> >>>Regards, >>>Manan Shah >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>On 12/18/12 7:59 PM, "Rajesh Battala" <rajesh.batt...@citrix.com> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Rajesh Battala [mailto:rajesh.batt...@citrix.com] >>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 9:21 AM >>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced >>>>instances >>>> >>>> >>>>-----Original Message----- >>>>From: Alex Huang [mailto:alex.hu...@citrix.com] >>>>Sent: Wednesday, December 19, 2012 4:38 AM >>>>To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org >>>>Subject: RE: [ASF4.1] [Discuss] health monitoring for load balanced >>>>instances >>>> >>>>> One question that I have though, which may be off topic to the >>>>> specific proposal. I understand that you are proposing Netscaler >>>>> and HAProxy support (and you are absolutely within your right to >>>>> only volunteer for those two), but I'd also love to see the F5 >>>>> support be upgraded to support this feature as well. >>>>> >>>>> Does anyone remember if F5 lent engineering support when F5 >>>>> support was added to CS? Or was it all Cloud.com / Citrix folks that did >>>>> it? >>>>> Ideally, this is a great place to see if we can get someone that's >>>>> interested in continuing to support the F5 LBs involved in >>>>> development (not necessarily someone sponsored by F5, but that's >>>>> not necessarily a negative if they were). Does anyone want to >>>>> take this on and work with Rajesh? >>>>> >>>> >>>>F5 was entirely written by Cloud.com. >>>> >>>>On features that can affect multiple hardware resources, we should >>>>create a subtask for each hardware resource to support that feature. >>>> >>>>--Alex >>>> >>>> >>>>We can have an umbrella ticket and create a sub ticket/task for each >>>>Hardware resource. I will create those tickets. >>>> >>>>Thanks >>>>Rajesh Battala >>>> >>>> >>>>Done creating the sub-tasks for each hardware resources. >>>>Here are the tickets. >>>> >>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-663 health >>>>monitoring for F5 load balanced instances >>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-664 Health >>>>monitoring for NetScaler load balanced instances >>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-665 Health >>>>monitoring for HAProxy load balanced instances >>>>https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-666 Health >>>>monitoring for Brocade load balanced instances >>>> >>>> >>>>Thanks >>>>Rajesh Battala >>> >> >
