On Fri, Jan 04, 2013 at 01:37:03AM +0530, Alex Huang wrote: > > > The question was if someone challenges a vote by committing a binding > > veto -1, and if their veto is challenged (say the reasons were not obvious) > > and they are asked for reason(s) what should be the timeline for the person > > to reply/communicate. (say a case of someone trolling, the question was > > about handling trolls :) > > > > > > > Well, I think that the first issue would be that we shouldn't have > > trolls with binding votes... ;-) > > > > I guess it's a fair question though... any thoughts on how to think > > about that issue? I'd say that by default, we're talking about the > > normal "at least 72 hours" standard applying. > > > > 72 hrs sounds fair. > Shouldn't -1 votes come with a reason? I think we don't explicitly write that in the bylaws or did I miss it?
-- Prasanna.,
