> > The question was if someone challenges a vote by committing a binding > veto -1, and if their veto is challenged (say the reasons were not obvious) > and they are asked for reason(s) what should be the timeline for the person > to reply/communicate. (say a case of someone trolling, the question was > about handling trolls :) > > > > Well, I think that the first issue would be that we shouldn't have > trolls with binding votes... ;-) > > I guess it's a fair question though... any thoughts on how to think > about that issue? I'd say that by default, we're talking about the > normal "at least 72 hours" standard applying. >
72 hrs sounds fair. --Alex
