Jayesh and Jason, Thanks for voting, but can I please ask for the additional part of a -1 vote that I requested? A -1 vote should come along with both a "why" and an offer to help resolve the "why" in some way.
Of course, your help on the project would be greatly appreciated! -chip On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 1:31 PM, Jayesh Patel <jayesh.pa...@oracle.com> wrote: > -1 > > > On 10/19/2012 10:28 AM, Jason Pavao wrote: >> >> -1 >> >> >> On 10/19/2012 9:55 AM, Chip Childers wrote: >>> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Following up on the OVM discussion thread [1], it appears that we >>> don't have a full consensus yet. In order to move forward and make a >>> decision as a community, I would like to formally call a vote on this >>> issue. >>> >>> I'm proposing that we drop support of OVM for 4.0.0-incubating. I am >>> NOT proposing that this drop is permanent. If someone were to decide >>> that this is important enough to fix / update that code, then I would >>> be in full support of that effort. >>> >>> IMO, we can't block a release just because of preference. So if you >>> vote -1 for dropping support, I would like to know how you can help >>> get OVM fixed (coding, testing, documenting) for the release. >>> >>> So, for the vote, please respond with one of the following: >>> >>> [ ] +1 : we should drop support of OVM from the 4.0.0-incubating release >>> [ ] 0 : you don't have an opinion >>> [ ] -1 : we should not drop support of OVM, and do the work required >>> to get it ready prior to a 4.0.0-incubating release >>> >>> Thanks all! >>> >>> -chip >>> >>> >>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/ey5zbnhdjik2m2em >> >> >
