+1 not to hold up the release (with hope that it's picked up in a future release)
On Oct 19, 2012, at 10:55 AM, Chip Childers <chip.child...@sungard.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > Following up on the OVM discussion thread [1], it appears that we > don't have a full consensus yet. In order to move forward and make a > decision as a community, I would like to formally call a vote on this > issue. > > I'm proposing that we drop support of OVM for 4.0.0-incubating. I am > NOT proposing that this drop is permanent. If someone were to decide > that this is important enough to fix / update that code, then I would > be in full support of that effort. > > IMO, we can't block a release just because of preference. So if you > vote -1 for dropping support, I would like to know how you can help > get OVM fixed (coding, testing, documenting) for the release. > > So, for the vote, please respond with one of the following: > > [ ] +1 : we should drop support of OVM from the 4.0.0-incubating release > [ ] 0 : you don't have an opinion > [ ] -1 : we should not drop support of OVM, and do the work required > to get it ready prior to a 4.0.0-incubating release > > Thanks all! > > -chip > > > [1] http://markmail.org/message/ey5zbnhdjik2m2em
