+1 if you can confirm that non-committers will be able to join the list. I actually learned something useful from reading the comments during the resolution of bug 259.
-sebastien On Oct 6, 2012, at 8:31 PM, John Kinsella wrote: > Ah, from an archive standpoint, totally makes sense. > > On Oct 6, 2012, at 9:32 AM, Noah Slater <nsla...@tumbolia.org> wrote: > >> I'm already deploying filters, for sure. But the mail-archives are very >> messy and hard to use right now, and I'm thinking it might be hard for >> people just getting started with the project. >> >> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 5:31 PM, John Kinsella <j...@stratosec.co> wrote: >> >>> From my POV I don't think it's going to change much for the committers, >>> but have at it. The Jira emails already have a distinguishing subject... >>> >>> On Oct 6, 2012, at 8:48 AM, Outback Dingo <outbackdi...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Hugo Trippaers >>>> <htrippa...@schubergphilis.com> wrote: >>>>> +1 >>>>> >>>> >>>> ++1 their clouding whats relevant for users, and relevant for developers >>>> >>>> >>>>> Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad >>>>> >>>>> Op 6 okt. 2012 om 02:46 heeft "Noah Slater" <nsla...@tumbolia.org> het >>> volgende geschreven: >>>>> >>>>>> Community, >>>>>> >>>>>> I propose we move JIRA emails to a separate list. >>>>>> >>>>>> This should increase the signal:noise for the list for new >>> contributors and >>>>>> lurkers. >>>>>> >>>>>> If we did this, I would suggest that we make it a project bylaw that >>> all >>>>>> committers subscribe to the issues list. >>>>>> >>>>>> If I don't hear any objections, I will assume consensus through >>> silence and >>>>>> take care of this for us. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> NS >>>> >>> >>> Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service >>> o: 415.315.9385 >>> @johnlkinsella >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> NS > > Stratosec - Secure Infrastructure as a Service > o: 415.315.9385 > @johnlkinsella >
