First - apologies to everyone, I've been crazy busy this week, haven't had time to focus on this.
I chatted with folks on #asfinfra this morning. As we want to allow non-committers to submit feeds to the aggregator, they are reasonably concerned with non-committers producing content which shows up on ASF sites without moderation. What we came up with is this: * ASF will give us a VM to run http://planet.cloudstack.org on. By using this instead of planet.apache.org/cloudstack, we're able to include non-committers. * Committers will control adding feeds (of committers, developers, or users) to the aggregator (I'll put together a wiki page describing what's acceptable) * Infra will set this up for us, after I submit a Jira request, after we conduct a procedural vote. I think that's reasonable and within the bounds of what we talked about. I'll be sending out a VOTE email shortly. If you have any concerns, please don't hesitate to voice them. John On Aug 9, 2012, at 5:26 PM, David Nalley <da...@gnsa.us> wrote: > On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Brett Porter <br...@apache.org> wrote: >> Infra already runs planetapache, so there might be a way to reuse some of >> that if another is set up on a VM. >> >> Another option is that the project can blog on our Roller install. It's less >> individual / distributed, but good for official communication and can be >> done now: http://blogs.apache.org/ >> > > > Matt Domsch and I talked with folks in #asfinfra and they indicated > that p.a.o was built with the idea of having multiple feeds out, and > should be easily reusable. (and would create p.a.o/cloudstack > > As an aside, if you are a committer and blog, please aggregate your > blog on p.a.o/committers. > > --David >
