On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:08 AM, Chiradeep Vittal <chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > On 5/16/12 11:33 AM, "John Kinsella" <j...@stratosec.co> wrote: > >>On May 16, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote: >>> On 05/15/2012 10:08 PM, John Kinsella wrote: >>>> OK - took a little longer than intended, but I've got a draft put >>>>together. I can keep adding to this, but wanted to get it out for >>>>comments on what's written so far. >>>> >>>> One question - we seem to have "committers" as well as "maintainers." >>>>What's the difference between the two? >>>> >>>> I'm trying to reach a balance between an informal document and >>>>something as structured as the Linux development process (see the Linux >>>>Foundation link in the appendix). If people want to see more formality >>>>and structure, let me know. >>>> >>>> Please review what I have so far and share thoughts with the list. >>>>Thanks. :) >>>> >>>> >>>>http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/Draft%3A+CloudStack+Maintainers+ >>>>Guide (or http://wiki.cloudstack.org/x/MIB9) >>>[snip] >> >>> 3.) Being an ASF project I take it CS will use Jira, I think there >>>should be a link to Jira in the Patch Submission section. Also it should >>>be more clearly stated that feature requests also need to be entered in >>>Jira, rather than just stating they should be documented. >> >>Yep, I left out a few links as various functionality (new wiki, jira, >>etc) are not yet in place. Voting and release management can be greatly >>expanded, but wanted to get the other parts in place first. > > Any thoughts on using a review tool like Gerrit [1] or Phabricator [2] as > a front-end to git? Would that work in the Apache infrastructure? > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/ > [2] http://phabricator.org/ > > -- > Chiradeep >
Apache has reviewboard up - http://reviews.apache.org --David
