On 5/16/12 11:33 AM, "John Kinsella" <j...@stratosec.co> wrote:
>On May 16, 2012, at 5:33 AM, Robert Schweikert wrote: >> On 05/15/2012 10:08 PM, John Kinsella wrote: >>> OK - took a little longer than intended, but I've got a draft put >>>together. I can keep adding to this, but wanted to get it out for >>>comments on what's written so far. >>> >>> One question - we seem to have "committers" as well as "maintainers." >>>What's the difference between the two? >>> >>> I'm trying to reach a balance between an informal document and >>>something as structured as the Linux development process (see the Linux >>>Foundation link in the appendix). If people want to see more formality >>>and structure, let me know. >>> >>> Please review what I have so far and share thoughts with the list. >>>Thanks. :) >>> >>> >>>http://wiki.cloudstack.org/display/COMM/Draft%3A+CloudStack+Maintainers+ >>>Guide (or http://wiki.cloudstack.org/x/MIB9) >>[snip] > >> 3.) Being an ASF project I take it CS will use Jira, I think there >>should be a link to Jira in the Patch Submission section. Also it should >>be more clearly stated that feature requests also need to be entered in >>Jira, rather than just stating they should be documented. > >Yep, I left out a few links as various functionality (new wiki, jira, >etc) are not yet in place. Voting and release management can be greatly >expanded, but wanted to get the other parts in place first. Any thoughts on using a review tool like Gerrit [1] or Phabricator [2] as a front-end to git? Would that work in the Apache infrastructure? [1] http://code.google.com/p/gerrit/ [2] http://phabricator.org/ -- Chiradeep
