> Do you find it frustrating that there's no way to turn on instrumentation of function outputs for manual testing?
Yes. I've mentioned this elsewhere but I think being able to turn on output checking in lower environments (dev, test, master, staging) is getting extra values from specs basically for free. Being able to do it seems pragmatic. I'm hoping it won't be too difficult to write an `overinstrument-all` that gives me that when I want it. On Tuesday, July 12, 2016 at 5:36:39 PM UTC+10, Maarten Truyens wrote: > > I would also truly appreciate instrumentation of function outputs for > manual outputs. I understand the rationale for not having it as the > default, but could it perhaps be specified as an option s/instrument? > (Considering that it was present in the first alphas, I would assume that > such option should not be far-fetched.) > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
