Well, both Alex and Rich have said the change is deliberate and there are no plans to change that decision – and Rich talked about ways you can add return value testing manually based on specs (if you want, but he won’t help you) – so it seems like a “closed” topic to me? (and Alex has shut down a couple of other threads that have continued on past a clear line of decision)
I was sad to see :ret checking go away but I accept Rich’s line of thinking on this and I’ll adjust my workflow accordingly. I find Rich’s point that instrumentation is now about ensuring functions are _called_ correctly rather than trying to establish that they _behave_ correctly oddly compelling, now that I’ve had some time to think about it and play with it 😊 Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org From: Beau Fabry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
