correction...."decouple state from behavior" On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:24 PM, Timothy Baldridge <tbaldri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> So I feel compelled at this point to ask..."why?". The whole point of > functional programming in Clojure is to de-couple state from data. When you > need polymorphic dispatch on the contents of a map, you have access to > multi methods. Sure this is a fun thought experiment, but I don't > understand the design goals. It's a fairly verbose way to write more > complex code to accomplish what we already have good tools for > (protocols/multimethods, etc). Maybe I'm missing something. > > Timothy > > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 7:15 PM, William la Forge <laforg...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> James, when I used the term mixin I was referring to a map that acts like >> a trait that gets merged into a larger map. You would define several such >> smaller maps that can then be used in various combinations to compose >> "objects". The identity of the composite object (this) is the map which >> holds the merged contents of the smaller maps. I.E. The entries in the >> smaller maps get copied into the larger map. >> >> When executing functions held by a map, the last parameter is always the >> map itself, i.e. the "this". On the other hand, when placing closures into >> the map, the self reference is no longer needed as it is implicit in the >> closure. But this means that a closure can only reference the contents of >> the map when the closure was created, while a function can reference any of >> the contents of the map passed as its last argument. >> >> Why did I make the map reference the last argument for functions held by >> the map? So that we can do type polymorphism on the first argument passed >> to the function. But we should make an exception to this. To facilitate >> threading, functions which return an updated map should take that map as >> the first argument. But that is an API change and needs to wait for release >> 0.6.0. >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > > > -- > “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking > zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C > programs.” > (Robert Firth) > -- “One of the main causes of the fall of the Roman Empire was that–lacking zero–they had no way to indicate successful termination of their C programs.” (Robert Firth) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.