On May 6, 2015, at 4:26 AM, Paul deGrandis <paul.degran...@gmail.com> wrote: > I would argue that Pedestal is perhaps objectively simpler than Ring. I > would also add it's more performant, more flexible, and more secure (by > default).
As Surgo said in the other thread: "Projects like Pedestal do themselves a tremendous disservice with their poor front pages. It's probably an amazing project but it was very difficult to get a sense from the README.Md what it could actually do for me. Whoever owns the Pedestal project, please add a section to the top that is literally called something like "What Pedestal can do for you" and answers that question." And that’s why I thought that Pedestal looked very complex and hard to use. Even the Hello World example is couched in terms that make it look overly complex. And it’s not just Pedestal. A lot of Clojure projects suffer from this. java.jdbc suffers from this and it’s really easy to use too — I just haven’t figured out how to explain it properly :( Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "Perfection is the enemy of the good." -- Gustave Flaubert, French realist novelist (1821-1880) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
