Fluid Dynamics <a2093...@trbvm.com> writes: > You can have as many of them open as you like, say, one for > "task X", and one for "switching focus between windows". > > And then have what, two 27x24 and a 26x24 keyhole to squint through at > everything? :) Less a couple of lines at the bottom for status > notifications and the little command input area, of course.
You can have as many windows as you want, and you can have as many buffers as you want. Windows display buffers. You can have 2 windows on the same buffer, or you can have one window and a gazillion buffers in which case only one of them is displayed currently, but you can switch from one buffer to another buffer in the current window with `C-x b <buffer-name>'. It's not uncommon that I have 50 or more buffers at a time, and it's still very manageable. And of course, you don't need to run emacs on the linux console. I run it maximized in X with its graphical UI, and then I can easily have 3 windows side-by-side which are still wider than 80 columns. Anyway, there's no point in discussing with you as it seems you know better anyhow. So the discussion is finished for me. Bye, Tassilo -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.