Just to follow up on this, Tom reported to me on Twitter that the box giving slow results was bad and the regression was not repeatable on another box.
Alex On Monday, January 12, 2015 at 12:37:05 PM UTC-6, tcrayford wrote: > > I said this already on twitter, but I see heavy (5-10x slower) perf > regressions on my benchmark suite from 1.7-alpha5 vs 1.6. I am trying the > other alphas now - I have a comprehensive benchmark suite that takes 4 > hours or so to run, and it's a bit backed up right now (I only have one box > to run it on). I'm also going to point YourKit at 1.7-alpha5 soon on the > worst regressing benchmarks (not all of them have such heavy regressions, > and a few benchmarks are dramatically faster) and see what happens - will > report back here once I have something more to say. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
