On Thursday, April 17, 2014 10:36:13 AM UTC-5, A. Webb wrote:
> On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:35:14 PM UTC-5, Mars0i wrote: >> >> >> But then should realized? be able to deal with a Cons containing a >> LazySeq? >> >> (Is this an issue worthy of JIRA? I've never submitted there, and am not >> sure I know enough to do so. Willing to try to figure it out.) >> > > No, realized? works as intended on a single object. If you want to know > if there is an unrealized portion remaining of a sequence, just roll your > own function to step through it, being careful not to force realization of > unrealized portions while doing so. Untested example: > Very nice--thanks. But there's still a conflict between the docstrings for iterate and realized?, right? If it's true that iterate "Returns a lazy sequence", then it's false that realized? "Returns true if a value has been produced for a ... lazy sequence", since it throws an exception on what iteratereturns. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
