On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:35:14 PM UTC-5, Mars0i wrote: > > > But then should realized? be able to deal with a Cons containing a LazySeq? > > (Is this an issue worthy of JIRA? I've never submitted there, and am not > sure I know enough to do so. Willing to try to figure it out.) >
No, realized? works as intended on a single object. If you want to know if there is an unrealized portion remaining of a sequence, just roll your own function to step through it, being careful not to force realization of unrealized portions while doing so. Untested example: (defn seq-realized? "Returns false if there is an unrealized tail in the sequence, otherwise true." [s] (if (instance? clojure.lang.IPending s) (if (realized? s) (if (seq s) (recur (rest s)) true) false) (if (seq s) (recur (rest s)) true))) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.