On Wednesday, April 16, 2014 10:35:14 PM UTC-5, Mars0i wrote:
>
>
> But then should realized? be able to deal with a Cons containing a LazySeq?
>
> (Is this an issue worthy of JIRA? I've never submitted there, and am not 
> sure I know enough to do so.  Willing to try to figure it out.)
>

No, realized? works as intended on a single object. If you want to know if 
there is an unrealized portion remaining of a sequence, just roll your own 
function to step through it, being careful not to force realization of 
unrealized portions while doing so. Untested example:

(defn seq-realized? 
  "Returns false if there is an unrealized tail in the sequence,
  otherwise true."
  [s] 
  (if (instance? clojure.lang.IPending s) 
    (if (realized? s) 
      (if (seq s) 
        (recur (rest s)) 
        true) 
      false) 
    (if (seq s) 
      (recur (rest s)) 
      true)))

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to