Let me state that, as long as it is a asteroids clone, it is fine.  
However, compared to Java, the performance was much worse(when just playing 
with it and drawing tons of asteroids in opengl).  Also, I do not know what 
you mean when you say that you have tested it... the 

pure way or the mutate objects in place way?  I can get great performance 
with clojure, no doubt about it, by violating the shat out of functional 
programming.  I can not get great performance with the beautiful, pure, 
composable, clojure that I desire!  I have seen many game 

examples in "clojure" where, basically, clojure is just a scripting 
language that wraps java.  It is no problem if this is the case, my 
question has jack crap to do about getting good performance writing 
asteroids.  My question is: Will clojure(the immutable composable side) 

benefit from shenandoah(blasted font) at all?  Can someone who knows a good 
bit about clojure tell me if a more powerful garbage collector would allow 
us clojurians to be more pure or is it something else inherently in 
immutable land that will "never"(it will take a long time) get fixed.

On Wednesday, March 12, 2014 6:53:43 PM UTC-4, James Reeves wrote:
>
> I've done a fair bit of experimentation with writing games in Clojure, and 
> I haven't noticed any major performance issues. If you're getting issues on 
> a 2D asteroids clone, I suspect there might be something inefficient in 
> your code. I find Criterium useful for benchmarking parts of my code in 
> isolation to get an idea of how its running.
>
> - James
>
>
> On 12 March 2014 21:53, Jacob Goodson <submissio...@gmx.com 
> <javascript:>>wrote:
>
>> How many people have heard of this GC?  
>> http://www.jclarity.com/2014/02/19/shenandoah-a-new-low-pause-garbage-collection-algorithm-for-the-java-hotspot-jvm/
>>
>> I want to know if this would benefit clojure.  I wrote a small asteroids 
>> game in clojure and the performance was not good.  I stuck to purity when 
>> writing the game, only "mutating" my data after it had passed through a 
>> bazillion pure functions.  I was wondering, would a GC like this one(or 
>> Azul's) make a significant impact so that I, or others, could make games in 
>> a more pure fashion?  I WANT MY EFFIN PURITY!
>>  
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> --- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to