It seems like Congitect is heavily invested in it’s future, and committed to 
moving it forward.  I suspect it will change significantly as adoption 
increases, but that will probably be a good thing.

Clojure is still so new that it’s hard to know if there will be “one web 
framework to rule them all”, IMHO.

I suggest investing yourself into it.  It can’t hurt, and will make you a 
better cl/cljs dev if nothing else.


On Nov 7, 2013, at 3:12 PM, Andreas Liljeqvist <bon...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I sure hope it does.
> 
> Not a master of it yet, but the concept seems very interesting.
> I know that there is a guy writing a book about it.
> 
> Many of the other somewhat related technologies like Django are a completely 
> different cognitive model.
> More tutorials would be great, also they should stress the importance of 
> understanding the model.
> Its kind of glossed over in the tutorial.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 7, 2013 at 11:30 PM, Marko Kocić <ma...@euptera.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to hear opinions about Pedestal from the people that have been 
> playing more with it. Right now I started looking at it, and like some of the 
> things, but not sure should I invest more time learning it. While I do like 
> some concepts, I'm not sure is it going to became abandonware like 
> Clojurescript One (does anyone reemembers it anymore).
> 
> So far, after initial splash, I haven't seen large community interest in it. 
> The number of aproachable getting started guides and hands on tutorials is 
> missing. That might change over time, but I'm afraid that next year this time 
> we'll get another Clojurescript one page application framework not much 
> related with Pedestal. How serious Cognitect/Relevance is about it?
> 
> Best regards,
> Marko
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
> 
> 
> -- 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

marcus blankenship
\\\ Partner, Problem Solver, Linear Thinker
\\\ 541.805.2736 \ @justzeros \ skype:marcuscreo

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to