On 24 Oct 2013, at 01:46, Stuart Halloway <stuart.hallo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Is the Scala for lazy or eager? If the latter, you are not comparing apples > to apples (separate from the other differences David already pointed out.) Oh, it's eager. Bear in mind that my purpose wasn't really to directly compare Scala and Clojure - in fact, I was originally planning to knock up a fully lazy solution in Clojure to demonstrate that the memory-hungry eager Scala solution could be trivially made to run in much less memory in Clojure. Unfortunately I got mired in this performance issue before I could get to that point. -- paul.butcher->msgCount++ Snetterton, Castle Combe, Cadwell Park... Who says I have a one track mind? http://www.paulbutcher.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbutcher MSN: p...@paulbutcher.com AIM: paulrabutcher Skype: paulrabutcher -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
