On Oct 23, 2013, at 14:34 , Mark Engelberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Another example of why this has more to do with the hashing of sets, than
> underlying elements:
> => (hash #{#{1 2} 3})
> 6
> => (hash #{#{1 3} 2})
> 6
The hash-combining function for sets must be commutative. But in order for the
hashes of #{#{1 2} 3} and #{#{1 3} 2} to be unequal, it must also be
non-associative. That's possible, but I'm not sure what would be a good
candidate function. Something involving averaging, perhaps?
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
