On Jul 24, 2013, at 12:45 PM, dennis zhuang wrote: > I am using ':use' for my own namespaces.I know it's discouraged, but if i can > control my own code,why not? Compiler can give me warnings and i process all > warnings carefully.
I agree. But I do now see that it's really just about as good, and better for other reasons, to use :require :refer :all instead. However, if the language then starts hassling me about using :require :refer :all then that will really rain on my parade. I don't want to have to jump through hoops to get different parts of my projects to see each other. Clojure already requires more of this than I'd prefer -- e.g. no way to require a whole subdirectory with a wildcard (and I understand this is unlikely to happen) -- and it'd be a drag to have to maintain lists of every function name everywhere. -Lee -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
