Lately, a lot of people are moving away from dynamic blog engines like
Wordpress, and starting to use static blog generators like Jekyll.

You may want to consider this route instead. I'm sure a plugin system would
still be relevant and useful for a static blog generator.

-Steven


On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Timothy Washington <twash...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello,
>
> I'm thinking of how to build a composable blogging engine in Clojure.
> There have been a few attempts at this, with 
> cow-blog<https://github.com/briancarper/cow-blog>and
> my-blog <https://github.com/georgerogers42/my-blog>. But these seem to be
> abandoned, and not heavily used. Vijay Kiran, last year, even wrote a
> series of blog posts (see 
> here<http://www.vijaykiran.com/2012/01/17/web-application-development-with-clojure-part-2/>)
> about building a blog engine. As far as a list of posts goes, the data
> structure for each record was simple:
>
>    - title
>    - content
>    - status
>    - created-date
>    - published-date
>    - author
>
>
> I think this is the most basic thing you could do, to get running. But I'm
> thinking of approaching the feature set of 
> Wordpress<http://codex.wordpress.org/WordPress_Features>.
> So I'm thinking of the Data Structure(s) of features like:
>
>    - Web UI component; wyswyg editor, themes
>    - Server component; embeddable in Compojure or Pedestal
>    - Database component;
>    - raw data structures, txt, rtf, images, audio, videos, documents
>       - adapters for Datomic, SQL(Postgres, etc), NoSQL (Mongo, etc)
>       - tags / categories for content
>    - Authentication & Authorization; OpenID
>    - Workflow component; preview, collaboration & editor review
>    - Commenting component; default or an external comments service, like
>    disqus <http://disqus.com> or discourse <http://www.discourse.org>
>    - Administration Console
>    - Plug-in support
>    - Import / Export
>    - Multi-lang / Internationalization
>
>
> I know that I currently wish I had a Clojure weblog engine that I could
> stick into a site I'm building. If there's already something available,
> I'll obviously just use that. But otherwise, is this something that would
> be interesting to people?
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Tim Washington
> Interruptsoftware.ca / Bkeeping.com
> 416.843.9060
>
>  --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to