>From the peanut gallery: I think this basic idea sounds fabulous. I've been kicking clojure's tires, and I keep meaning to slap a blog engine together. But then I go into tailspin because I want to blog about the experience, but my blogs are down and I don't want to go through setting up WP yet again, and...yeah. It's been kind of a "This is a fairly interesting project to introduce yourself to the language, but is it *really* worth doing yourself?" thing for me.
For me, the answer (so far) has been "That looks fun, and I'd like to be a contributor, but I just don't have time to tackle it now...maybe next weekend." So, anyway, before I disagree below, I'll add a basic +1. (For whatever my lurker n00b opinion might be worth). On Friday, July 19, 2013 2:53:30 PM UTC-5, frye wrote: > > My spidey sense is that the proposed data types (posts, assets, tags, > comments too ?), will have to be handled differently. > > What I plan to do though, is go through some basic workflow cases, and > work out the best data relationships. That's the point at which I think > common data types could be unified. Plus, a function, like export, could > also be a URL. So I wouldn't want to tie core resources to the concept of > Http URLs. Even though they may map neatly to stefon's actions. Thoughts ? > Isn't that basically the point to a URL? Especially when you consider the basic REST principles? *Someone* will want a RESTful blog eventually. Even if that's "just" a plugin, keeping those ideas in mind from the beginning seems like a wise practice. I haven't worked on a project yet where anyone ever wished that we hadn't invested in that up front. Though it's been far more common that we didn't, so it's mostly been a matter of trying to deal with the pain of replicating it later. I don't actually have a clue what you have in mind for stefon's actions. So maybe I'm actually agreeing with you. I apologize if this isn't coherent...it's been a long, brutal day. I saw this thread this morning, and this is the first chance I've had to respond (after I'm totally exhausted). Regards, James Sent from my Android > On Jul 19, 2013 3:26 PM, "Thorsten Wilms" <t_...@freenet.de <javascript:>> > wrote: > > > > On 07/19/2013 08:46 PM, Timothy Washington wrote: > >> > >> There would just be a core data model of posts, assets and tags, that > >> would exists as definitions, and could be pulled into a runtime soup. > > > > > > How about unifying everything that may be mapped to its own URL as > "resource"? Such a resource would have a unique name (or path/name > combination), created and modified timestamps, owner, permissions ... > > > > Such a data set would then be associated with an entity-type specific > data set to store what's special to a post or a comment or an image ... > > > > > > > > -- > > Thorsten Wilms > > > > thorwil's design for free software: > > http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ > > > > -- > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send > an email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. > > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. > > > > > -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
